Wizard Forums
Energy Manipulation: A Pocket Guide - Printable Version

+- Wizard Forums (http://wizardforums.com)
+-- Forum: Occult Discussion (/Forum-Occult-Discussion)
+--- Forum: Energy Manipulation (/Forum-Energy-Manipulation)
+--- Thread: Energy Manipulation: A Pocket Guide (/Thread-Energy-Manipulation-A-Pocket-Guide)

Pages: 1 2 3


Energy Manipulation: A Pocket Guide - Crow - 01-28-2012 09:52 PM

This is a great ebook for learning the basics of energy manipulation, and covering some intermediate and advanced stuff.

Download link:
Code:
http://i.minus.com/1327837901/h-_apvqBM3fhFCKWjiYtsQ/de1MPA8PGKa0a.pdf



RE: Energy Manipulation: A Pocket Guide - Boss - 01-30-2012 08:46 PM

Thank you, I am looking into learning about energy manipulation.


RE: Energy Manipulation: A Pocket Guide - Svarog - 02-01-2012 07:18 PM

Thanks for the share. This might prove useful in time.


RE: Energy Manipulation: A Pocket Guide - Pali - 02-03-2012 08:57 PM

Looking forward to reading this, thanks Crow. Happy


RE: Energy Manipulation: A Pocket Guide - Robbieava - 07-03-2012 11:36 PM

Adding this to my "things to read"! Thanks!


Energy Manipulation: A Pocket Guide - Sin - 07-04-2012 04:52 PM

This was posted on my birthday Tounge. I've downloaded it and have it stored in some new MF folder lol.


Energy Manipulation: A Pocket Guide - wannabe012 - 07-05-2012 05:27 AM

Thanks for the link Crow!


Energy Manipulation: A Pocket Guide - GTorge - 07-10-2012 02:39 AM

Thanks crow, great share.
~GTorge


Energy Manipulation: A Pocket Guide - Shadow - 07-10-2012 05:39 AM

Very good share for some of the beginner stuff. Wouldn't call anything there advanced, but it's still all good information.


Energy Manipulation: A Pocket Guide - Robbieava - 07-11-2012 10:20 AM

I have an important question for this. When it says "imagine the blue triangle" do we have to close our eyes and imagine it under our eye lids or in our minds.

Does this question make sense? I can't physically visualize it under my eye lids but inside my brain I can.. kind of. Does that make sense?