I think good, or beauty, is that which is deemed unto itself worthy of pursuit, absent of any evil. It's self defining. I would not say that evil is the opposite of good, rather that it is a corruption of such. For example, if you were to be married to a physically attractive woman and her face was mutilated, whether done intentionally by a malevolent actor or not, you would obviously see this as misfortune. It's evil, the pain, the destruction of beauty. You did not need to be aware of this to know your wife was beautiful. Likewise, you do not need to know of all of the criminals and murderers in the world to appreciate an act of kindness. There is the choice to take these things for granted, but it is a choice. There are some who live their whole lifespans, completely charmed, without ever seeing a drop of evil or doing anything much worse than getting into an argument or killing a fly. Would seeing the depths of human depravity make them appreciate what is good in their lives more? Maybe, but it really isn't necessary at all. Evil, at best, might make you appreciate good a little more. It absolutely is not necessary for good to exist. I would say evil can only destroy and corrupt, never create. In that way, it is reliant upon good for it's existence, as it needs something to corrupt and destroy, but the relationship is not actually reciprocal. That's what I believe, anyway. I don't know what you mean by lizard eyes. Maybe archons?