- Joined
- Sep 8, 2024
- Messages
- 65
- Reaction score
- 190
- Awards
- 1
To a large extent my thoughts here are semantic: it's a question of which words indicate which categories within a social context. This is made more complex by my sense that, as this stage, I've moved a very long way away from society. I really do not know how the general public perceive things anymore.
There is no question that, at one time, when I underwent my first awakening, my interests were "occult". The context for that awakening was largely within the Western Mystery Tradition and I was interested in things that touched upon the New Age (past life-regressions, Atlantis, etc.). However, over the years, that context fell away and my work is now so personalised that I really don't know if "occult" is the right term for it. I think a general observer seeing me engaged in a rite would certainly call it "occult" but that perception is one ultimately rooted in the idea that any spirituality outside of recognised religions is occult. Some of my interests, especially alchemy and tarot, would fit neatly under the category but many of my other thoughts are actually deeply opposed to the theologies which underlay unarguable instances of the "occult" such as Cabala, Goetia or Agrippa.
I wonder if the term includes more that I am now opposed to than inspires me. This is complicated yet further in that I have not replaced an "occult mindset" with a rational one. On the contrary, my thoughts have become more noetic and individual with time. Time was when the occult section of a library would be the first place I would head towards. Now I'm more inclined to spend time among the Romantics and aesthetes who move me far deeper than the conjurings and incantations which seem to comprise the bulk of "occult discourse", even on sites such as this. Should I renounce my "occultism"? Of course, I'd continue to engage in my personal magic and the mystical traditions which speak to me (Sufism, Tantra, Ukiyo) but I wonder if the idea of the "occult" has outlived its usefulness for me...
There is no question that, at one time, when I underwent my first awakening, my interests were "occult". The context for that awakening was largely within the Western Mystery Tradition and I was interested in things that touched upon the New Age (past life-regressions, Atlantis, etc.). However, over the years, that context fell away and my work is now so personalised that I really don't know if "occult" is the right term for it. I think a general observer seeing me engaged in a rite would certainly call it "occult" but that perception is one ultimately rooted in the idea that any spirituality outside of recognised religions is occult. Some of my interests, especially alchemy and tarot, would fit neatly under the category but many of my other thoughts are actually deeply opposed to the theologies which underlay unarguable instances of the "occult" such as Cabala, Goetia or Agrippa.
I wonder if the term includes more that I am now opposed to than inspires me. This is complicated yet further in that I have not replaced an "occult mindset" with a rational one. On the contrary, my thoughts have become more noetic and individual with time. Time was when the occult section of a library would be the first place I would head towards. Now I'm more inclined to spend time among the Romantics and aesthetes who move me far deeper than the conjurings and incantations which seem to comprise the bulk of "occult discourse", even on sites such as this. Should I renounce my "occultism"? Of course, I'd continue to engage in my personal magic and the mystical traditions which speak to me (Sufism, Tantra, Ukiyo) but I wonder if the idea of the "occult" has outlived its usefulness for me...