King Charles is illegal? You sound like Ollie Cromwell.
Psychic links don't have to be made through physical contact, intent is enough. Nor is a real name, photo etc. needed, an 'Anonymous' name is enough. Remote Viewing experiments have been done where the viewer isn't told the target, all they've been given is a series of random numbers not corresponding to the physical location of the Target. It would seem that curses would follow the same idea of Intent being the important factor.
Exactly. Some very rare people have a way of writing that hits home right were it hurts, that give you the creeps despite yourself. It helps if these persons already have a certain reputation and you're in awe of them. For example, I wouldn't like to be on the receiving end of a forum curse by TheGodKing but will probably laugh at anyone else here trying their best to empress me with their edgy rantings and ridiculous claims to mysterious powers.
Come to think on it, a name one chooses and identifies with his ideas (as in a forum) would most likely have a pretty strong link with the writer.
Now you're like the new marshall in some bad Western who just told the gang of leering yahoos "I ain't afeart of none a' ya!" They're sure to try and bushwhack you.
@HoldAll Considering you were an armchair occultist, should I practice a simple bad luck curse on you. And maybe you shouldn't insult someone who has mysterious magical powers, because if he truly has, and flexes it on you...
As long as we're on that topic, what about AI. Could a mage hex an AI respondent? I imagine so. Could AI be set up so as to hex others? I imagine if I could write algorithms for that, I could retire after peddling that to the interested state security organs, terrorists so-called, or whomsoever.
Far be it from me to insult TheGodKing, I'm really in awe of the guy, and it's more than possible that someone with similar powers is just lurking here and is even more capable of ruining my life. Why would you want curse me with bad luck though? To teach me a lesson on general principles? I'll freely admit that my cockiness was perhaps a mistake and directed at impotent edgelords posturing in forums but I refuse to be cowed by a random person on the internet.
I guess you would have to ask yourself "What would a successful outcome look like?" for cursing a chatbot
If it STFU I'm generally happy.I guess you would have to ask yourself "What would a successful outcome look like?" for cursing a chatbot
How do you verify the aircraft carrier location? I've read then- Captain Joseph McMoneagle's book, but he had the military to check up on what he said himself to have seen.
Correlation is vital. Unless the results are checked by 'normal' means, there are no successes. Trying to find the remote viewing experiments where the results were not correlated with the participants...
That is what I was asking. How to know if the aircraft carrier I saw was where I think to have seen it? I just checked online. One can google roughly the location of all 11 USN aircraft carriers. My query, though, is to verify precisely where one is, aside from remote viewing. The U.S.S. Theodore Roosevelt, for example, is "in the South China Sea." For a remote viewing to be real, we would need another info source that gave, say, latitude and longitude, visible islands, etc.
