- Joined
- Nov 18, 2025
- Messages
- 410
- Reaction score
- 330
- Awards
- 6
In my attempts to understand the Western nature of books and manuscripts—being a bookworm by nature—I found a distant hermitage where a coffin lies, named 'The Book of Abramelin.' I looked at it and translated it with careful consideration, noting many observations. First, it greatly annoyed me that those who translated it or passed it down turned the Abramelin system into a temple of waiting and a cold cell where lifetimes are wasted. Men, for God's sake, we truly possess nothing but time; all else is just loans passed from person to person. Therefore, I decided to ransack that hermitage, even if it required tearing it down following the principle of Samson.
First, the discrepancy between the two versions: one says 18 months—a year and a half! I was shocked. A year and a half just for a beautiful girl to appear and tell me, 'I am your Guardian Angel'? For us, angels are not women; they are always in masculine forms. More importantly, will you test and maintain certainty for eighteen months without any sign that you are on the right track? And what if you missed a day due to an emergency or illness—do I start all over again?! It is a technical failure in the work, indicating that something is wrong with this discourse. Not every manuscript is worth cheering for like a foolish girl just because it is old. I myself have fed the fire with manuscripts I found to be Arabic cognitive nonsense; I said their burning would be better as fertilizer for plants than occupying myself with such rubbish.
There is nothing useful in rosy dreams; they are daydreams, and in this specific science, I dislike daydreams. The veterans, like the forum founder and Black Morgan, know the amount of nonsense we suffered in the early nineties to find a true benefit with meaning. A practitioner who needs a year and a half to hear a voice is a practitioner who has never known the chemistry of 'The Flash of Insight' (Al-Khatir) and the speed of 'Response.'
Lest I drift away, I return to say there is another German manuscript (such as the Wolfenbüttel manuscript) confirming the duration is only 6 months. To me, this too is a scientific tragedy; six months to hear or see something is truly too long. I researched again and found that the Abramelin system, as taught today in the West (due to the influence of Mathers and Crowley), has turned into a 'psychological experience' or a quiet mystical prayer. But will the prayers to God in the Psalms be effective in bringing forth Leviathan or Lucifer, or in speaking with Asmodeus? It is like a man sitting in the forest conjuring a hungry lion with a Psalm. 'Abraham the Jew' made the Psalms a religious curtain to hide 'Compulsive Conjurations' behind them.
Also, the literal or simple numerical squares, which we call 'The Gullible'—not as a gain, but from the word 'Ghabita,' meaning like black earth waiting for seeds, irrigation, and fertilization to produce the fruits of knowledge—not for me to draw circles of delusions on the ground and sit still, happily waiting for someone who will never come. The 'Khalwa' (seclusion) in the East is different; we do not worship here in the presence of the Divine, but we want a result and a different answer. I will not say the Psalms have no power; they have a spiritual power that feeds you faithfully and brings you closer to the Lord, much like the prayers in the 'Key of Solomon' books—prayers before evocations or confessions, mere purification of the soul, mind, and body, like a ritual washing to be a white raw material fit for accepting the Secret. But it is your spirit, man! God granted you a spirit; in my teachings, it is a breath from God Himself, not given to our father Adam through a medium. It is an expression of the ultimate Sovereignty for him whom God appointed and destined as His vicegerent on earth. We are the ones who blast mountains, divert the courses of rivers, and split the earth—shall we sit like this in total submissiveness, waiting as an object (passive) rather than a subject (active)?
In my discourse, I did not come to provoke anyone or be a preacher. Had I wanted that, I would have found places with soil more suitable for my words; for I am certain my words are like seeds, and like a skilled farmer, I will place each seed in its correct spot. But as a researcher, I possess a rebellious spirit that refuses to live by the premise of 'He said, therefore it is true.' Instead, I subject everything to my mind, understanding, and perception.
The other truth and a summary of my viewpoint: Does the Book of Abramelin hide only the husks, like exhausting prayers, days, etc., to say that the original manuscript was hidden or its heart plucked out, leaving it spiritless to be a catalog for the true practitioner and a maze to catch beginners? Did Abramelin know what he was saying, or was he pointing to signs further than the position of his finger? He was pointing to cognitive treasures.
I followed some practitioners of schools like 'Gallery of Magick'; they simplify things with the simplicity of an expert, but they sell you the ready-made meal. As for how it was cooked, that has another form. The 'Book of Demons' exhausted me—it shakes with the words of demons: 'Come on, friend, say P-P-P-A-I-M-M-O-N,' and so on. He will see you with the abbreviation, but not with this 'stupidity' just to sell a copy of a book. Someone might say to me, 'I tried it.' I tell him: 'You tried it after you drew the sigils, struggled in evocations, and joined magical groups that made you known to the demons.' They follow everyone who clings to the table of research, everyone who is a candidate to be a sorcerer.
If you notice, there are those who step toward the stars walking for years, and there are those to whom the stars come voluntarily to assist them and carry them in their flying domes and palaces, which resemble suspended cities flying in space, while we sanctify shapes and squares whose owners have forgotten they even exist. This is my first proposition, and I wait—even for once—not for an attack on my person, but for a sober or even a reckless scientific discussion. I am a fan of cowboy movies; we stay up, sing, bicker, and fire shots, haha. A happy day to everyone.
First, the discrepancy between the two versions: one says 18 months—a year and a half! I was shocked. A year and a half just for a beautiful girl to appear and tell me, 'I am your Guardian Angel'? For us, angels are not women; they are always in masculine forms. More importantly, will you test and maintain certainty for eighteen months without any sign that you are on the right track? And what if you missed a day due to an emergency or illness—do I start all over again?! It is a technical failure in the work, indicating that something is wrong with this discourse. Not every manuscript is worth cheering for like a foolish girl just because it is old. I myself have fed the fire with manuscripts I found to be Arabic cognitive nonsense; I said their burning would be better as fertilizer for plants than occupying myself with such rubbish.
There is nothing useful in rosy dreams; they are daydreams, and in this specific science, I dislike daydreams. The veterans, like the forum founder and Black Morgan, know the amount of nonsense we suffered in the early nineties to find a true benefit with meaning. A practitioner who needs a year and a half to hear a voice is a practitioner who has never known the chemistry of 'The Flash of Insight' (Al-Khatir) and the speed of 'Response.'
Lest I drift away, I return to say there is another German manuscript (such as the Wolfenbüttel manuscript) confirming the duration is only 6 months. To me, this too is a scientific tragedy; six months to hear or see something is truly too long. I researched again and found that the Abramelin system, as taught today in the West (due to the influence of Mathers and Crowley), has turned into a 'psychological experience' or a quiet mystical prayer. But will the prayers to God in the Psalms be effective in bringing forth Leviathan or Lucifer, or in speaking with Asmodeus? It is like a man sitting in the forest conjuring a hungry lion with a Psalm. 'Abraham the Jew' made the Psalms a religious curtain to hide 'Compulsive Conjurations' behind them.
Also, the literal or simple numerical squares, which we call 'The Gullible'—not as a gain, but from the word 'Ghabita,' meaning like black earth waiting for seeds, irrigation, and fertilization to produce the fruits of knowledge—not for me to draw circles of delusions on the ground and sit still, happily waiting for someone who will never come. The 'Khalwa' (seclusion) in the East is different; we do not worship here in the presence of the Divine, but we want a result and a different answer. I will not say the Psalms have no power; they have a spiritual power that feeds you faithfully and brings you closer to the Lord, much like the prayers in the 'Key of Solomon' books—prayers before evocations or confessions, mere purification of the soul, mind, and body, like a ritual washing to be a white raw material fit for accepting the Secret. But it is your spirit, man! God granted you a spirit; in my teachings, it is a breath from God Himself, not given to our father Adam through a medium. It is an expression of the ultimate Sovereignty for him whom God appointed and destined as His vicegerent on earth. We are the ones who blast mountains, divert the courses of rivers, and split the earth—shall we sit like this in total submissiveness, waiting as an object (passive) rather than a subject (active)?
In my discourse, I did not come to provoke anyone or be a preacher. Had I wanted that, I would have found places with soil more suitable for my words; for I am certain my words are like seeds, and like a skilled farmer, I will place each seed in its correct spot. But as a researcher, I possess a rebellious spirit that refuses to live by the premise of 'He said, therefore it is true.' Instead, I subject everything to my mind, understanding, and perception.
The other truth and a summary of my viewpoint: Does the Book of Abramelin hide only the husks, like exhausting prayers, days, etc., to say that the original manuscript was hidden or its heart plucked out, leaving it spiritless to be a catalog for the true practitioner and a maze to catch beginners? Did Abramelin know what he was saying, or was he pointing to signs further than the position of his finger? He was pointing to cognitive treasures.
I followed some practitioners of schools like 'Gallery of Magick'; they simplify things with the simplicity of an expert, but they sell you the ready-made meal. As for how it was cooked, that has another form. The 'Book of Demons' exhausted me—it shakes with the words of demons: 'Come on, friend, say P-P-P-A-I-M-M-O-N,' and so on. He will see you with the abbreviation, but not with this 'stupidity' just to sell a copy of a book. Someone might say to me, 'I tried it.' I tell him: 'You tried it after you drew the sigils, struggled in evocations, and joined magical groups that made you known to the demons.' They follow everyone who clings to the table of research, everyone who is a candidate to be a sorcerer.
If you notice, there are those who step toward the stars walking for years, and there are those to whom the stars come voluntarily to assist them and carry them in their flying domes and palaces, which resemble suspended cities flying in space, while we sanctify shapes and squares whose owners have forgotten they even exist. This is my first proposition, and I wait—even for once—not for an attack on my person, but for a sober or even a reckless scientific discussion. I am a fan of cowboy movies; we stay up, sing, bicker, and fire shots, haha. A happy day to everyone.
