I also want to point out that this is less about "the difference between curses and talismans" and more about "hey, there are definitely spells that don't aim to do one or the other" which is another reason I decided on No Hand Path versus Ambi Path.
I guess to be more clear on what my practice does, and it isn't "fence sitting":
My practice does not aim to generate wealth, or to get someone to fall in love with me. While I have done money spells in the past, magic for me has always been a path of self-cultivation, Truth Seeking, and gathering of general knowledge. When I cast my divinatory magic (whether it be tarot, runes, I Ching, gem stones, etc), I am seeking to determine the paths that are probable (not possible, there is a difference) and then using my magic to subtly push factors "out of my control" into my favor. My first spell I ever performed was one of future reading (not fortune telling, there's a subtle difference). While some may claim that divination is "RHP", I first learned that it was based on necromancy (literally communion with the dead), or divination (literally communion with the divine). Yes, there is the argument that it's not directly harming someone, but the mere fact that even historically divination was considered a "dark art" nullifies the idea of "white versus black" magic (which in itself is a derivation of necro/negromancy).
I may be losing the thread here, but I don't consider myself to be communing with demons or angels, or even performing specific "healing" or "cursing" rites, which leads me to wonder where I would sit on this dichotomy. Sure, it may be pretentious to be like "I'm neither left nor right handed!!" But sincerely, at some point there is going to be either a hard division on every spell, incantation, ceremony, or talisman, or the line just doesn't exist.