I think that it is overly complex and because so it limits the magus who reaches its conclusion. It is hard for someone who has been unraveling the psychotic ramblings of Aleister Crowley for a decade to look at magic through another lense once they have outgrown his system.
With that being said it is robust and everything you need is in the box. Its just self limiting. I feel the same about golden dawn.
As AI agrees with me in that ; '' term "Thelemite" does not have a single, universal, and strictly dogmatic definition, as the philosophy of Thelema emphasizes individualism and personal interpretation. ''
You must have some specific form of , or definition of , what type of Thelemic practice you are referring to ? IE the 'system ' ... which particular Thelemic 'system' ? ( In regard to the OP's '' ... with this particular system . '' )
A Thelemite is basically someone who accepts the idea and worth of pursuit of the ''True Will'' and accepts the revelation of the Book of the Law ( with no authority on how they should interpret it ) .
I dont think any curriculum like that for the O.T.O. or the A.A is specified ? Nor having to go through Magick in Theory and Practice Bk IV and the required 'reading lists' and ' Libers ' and doing all those rituals . If that were the case I would agree with you .
Considering what is being asked , I feel it could be as complex or simple as one wants .
Post automatically merged:
Ohhh .... I meant to mention ,,,, ' stellar magick ' eh ? Interesting ... our group did a 'Stella Yoga ' practice for several months .
- can you link me to some posts on it ? ( I did a search but not much came up )