The Darkest Magick

[WordCraft666]

Recently it dawned on me that religion is the darkest magic out there.

Reason why?

Religion is dark magic disguised as white magic.

Religion is used to justify war & taxes & prisons & mental wards -this being the ultimate enslavement grid.

It's cantrip is "YHWH". Speaking-it is punishable to your reputation and wealth

 

[Robert Ramsay]

From my point of view, most monotheistic religions are just half-assed ways of doing magic, tacked on to some kind of moral code.

 

[Morell]

Sometimes I find it really hard to connect the darkness with evil. Maybe because I find night and darkness so beautiful.

Evil magic is indeed out there. Though it is always complicated, the problem of good and evil.

 

[WordCraft666]

Sometimes I find it really hard to connect the darkness with evil. Maybe because I find night and darkness so beautiful.

Evil magic is indeed out there. Though it is always complicated, the problem of good and evil.

The poltical narrative is dark magic on the masses.

The intent of their magic is schizophrenia, suicidal thoughts, and civil war.

I woke up 12 months ago. My learning so far is that schizophrenia happens merely when you let people live in your head rent-free.

Most inspirational quote?

"Anger needs Oxygen"
(unknown/deceased)

 

[Firetree]

Sometimes I find it really hard to connect the darkness with evil. Maybe because I find night and darkness so beautiful.

Evil magic is indeed out there. Though it is always complicated, the problem of good and evil.

Love that ! I live in the countryside ... no lighting at night . A friend that was into magick ( and part of a city group that was into it too ) was visiting . He could not comprehend how we walked around on a moonless night ... starlight ! he thought that was impossible, although we were doing it . One night we were sitting on my veranda and he was looking out into the darkness ; '' You know ... a lot of people might be scared out here .''

Me; '' Oh ? 'Other people ??? ' eh , why might that be . ''

''Well you cant see anything out there .''

Me ; '' That does not mean that I dont know what is out there though . ''



Dark , velvety, blackness ....... ahhhhhhhhh !

 

[iseht]

Its worth separating the mystical traditions that the different religions were born from from their corrupted mainstream orthodox cousins. Much of the occult came directly from these mystical traditions and there is still much to be learned from the oh so evil religions if one has an eye for nuance and subtle teachings.

 

[Beyond Everything]

Religion is dark magic disguised as white magic.

This 100000x. There are hostile beings (hostile to humanity) who delight in the fact humans are submissive to god, gods, or more abstract metaphysical principles.

 

[Firetree]

Religion certainly uses magical technology ; look at the Catholic High Mass ( do they still do that ? ) ; Processions, standards and standard bearers, swinging censors and incense , aspergilis and magic holy water , trans substantiation and etc .

Now considering what it supposedly is enacting ( basically The Last Supper ) how on earth did all that magical technology get into their rituals ?

- a way of 'influencing' I am supposing
or...

go from 1: 10

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

[A.Nox]

Love that ! I live in the countryside ... no lighting at night . A friend that was into magick ( and part of a city group that was into it too ) was visiting . He could not comprehend how we walked around on a moonless night ... starlight ! he thought that was impossible, although we were doing it . One night we were sitting on my veranda and he was looking out into the darkness ; '' You know ... a lot of people might be scared out here .''

Me; '' Oh ? 'Other people ??? ' eh , why might that be . ''

''Well you cant see anything out there .''

Me ; '' That does not mean that I dont know what is out there though . ''



Dark , velvety, blackness ....... ahhhhhhhhh !

I always say - the darker it gets, the clearer I think.
Night strips away all the noise.

 

[duager]

The Russian Orthodox Church is doing something that looks a lot like necromancy. I mean... Kissing relics, displaying mummified body parts of so-called “saints.” All of it served under the sauce of Christianity. And of course, it openly approves of and blesses the war and the killing of Ukrainian civilians. If this isn’t worse than the most hardcore Satanism, then what is? Even Satan himself wouldn’t approve of something like this.

 

[Amadeus]

The Russian Orthodox Church is doing something that looks a lot like necromancy. I mean... Kissing relics, displaying mummified body parts of so-called “saints.

I have thought of the same thing here. It looks like some form of it. Strange pieces of body parts, like say...blessed x piece of saint x
I'm a member of orthodox churches, and one priest told me that after he got ordained he had hard time giving speeches. In orthodox churches the homilies are very short, some 5 to 10mins at most. He said the saints kept giving him thoughts, thoughts came from out of nowhere, words, entire sentences.
It's hard to find the video but I remember a really good one, explained how it's a powerful form of necromancy. The video was in russian but with google translate worked fine.

 

[juanitos]

The cult of relics does not belong to Jesus and apostle's period..!!

it appeared later when happened the persecutions and the martyrs.. It is a pretty barbaric habit to cut in small pieces the body of a saint and spread these pieces to different churches all over the world!! what the heck is that?? do you think Jesus would approve such an insane stuff??
Is it really necessary at all to do this crazy stuff?? just a rhetorical question ..as this is the way in all orthodox christian churches everywhere..

Many other stuff in use in Catholic or Orthodox Church are purely later innovations or inventions without any base in what Jesus did or preached.. Anyway, who can possibly know what his teachings looked like as all Gospels were written many decades after his death?

 

[Reaper]

Not being emo.......but the black of night is where my best thinking takes place.
The quiet is soothing.

 

[Van Horne]

Sometimes I find it really hard to connect the darkness with evil.

Agreed! To me, darkness and evil are not same. Evil is the consequence to action, subjectively perceived. Darkness is a state, the absence of light.

 

[Reaper]

Put eloquently my friend!

 

[FireBorn]

Love that ! I live in the countryside ... no lighting at night . A friend that was into magick ( and part of a city group that was into it too ) was visiting . He could not comprehend how we walked around on a moonless night ... starlight ! he thought that was impossible, although we were doing it . One night we were sitting on my veranda and he was looking out into the darkness ; '' You know ... a lot of people might be scared out here .''

Me; '' Oh ? 'Other people ??? ' eh , why might that be . ''

''Well you cant see anything out there .''

Me ; '' That does not mean that I dont know what is out there though . ''



Dark , velvety, blackness ....... ahhhhhhhhh !

Yeah man, I live way out on the East Texas woods. No ambient light out here. I love it actually. No such thing as cant see out in the dark, you can, you just have to get used to it. Well unless you are a city dweller coming out to visit. I can walk around the woods in the dark on almost any night, almost. Acclimation is the key. There is a metaphor in there somewhere

Regarding religion being the darkest magick, okay cool. I mean most of the modern occult came from the Abrahamic so take that as you will.

To me though, darkness and evil are two different things. Evil was invented by man. Zoroaster was key in that, prior to him, no evil. Imagine that shit! No evil, just the underworld where every human went, it wasnt bad, just where everyone went after death. Good spirits, nasty spirits, storm spirits. Not evil anything. I prefer this belief as it removes the Abrahamic constraints (chains) of belief so I can see things as they are, rather through someone elses rose colored lenses. Thats just me, but it works for me. Others can believe as they choose.

 

[Reaper]

In Oklahoma here and get exactly what you are saying about walking in the woods at night. The eyes get used to the starlight. I do believe that evil and dark are two different things. The dark of night is calming. It is easier for me to hear and feel during the night. Not as much psychic smog.

 

[Firetree]

Yeah man, I live way out on the East Texas woods. No ambient light out here. I love it actually. No such thing as cant see out in the dark, you can, you just have to get used to it. Well unless you are a city dweller coming out to visit. I can walk around the woods in the dark on almost any night, almost. Acclimation is the key. There is a metaphor in there somewhere

Regarding religion being the darkest magick, okay cool. I mean most of the modern occult came from the Abrahamic so take that as you will.

To me though, darkness and evil are two different things. Evil was invented by man.

True .

Zoroaster was key in that, prior to him, no evil. Imagine that shit!

Not really , that came through later redaction in Zoroastrianism . If you read the earliest Avesta ' good and bad ' are qualities of 'mind ' ; Mainyu - spenta mainyu or angra mainyu . Then Mainyu became 'spirits' , then it went into duality in deity ( which is rubbish , even in Zoroastrianism as its (earlier ) Mono deistic . They admit mainyu IS mind , but ..... blah blah blah
( 'justifications ' ) . When the earliest Avestas are read with this original interpretation , it comes off more like Buddhism, in that it can be seen as 'a science of the mind ' .

Of course good and bad was what was good for them and what was not . Way before that going right back it was about
Man as wild animal Vs Man as Social / tribal animal : hind brain VS fore brain ; Individual ' Id ' Vs ' Group ' etc . It is all relative but the original concept was about how and why one's mind can go 'bad ' ( selfish , anti social , disrupting the collective ) or good , supporting it . It's the essential of initiation ; learning what base things you need to give up to get the advantages of the specific group .

Prior to him ? Nah there was still 'evil ' anything from the invading Indo Europeans , through to the Australian Aboriginals , were just about any misfortune was due to evil spirits .

If anything Zoroaster was ... nope ! It is all in your MIND . But it still got changed back to '' the Devil made me do it ! ''

No evil, just the underworld where every human went, it wasnt bad, just where everyone went after death. Good spirits, nasty spirits, storm spirits. Not evil anything.

That sounds like the early Greek underworld .

I prefer this belief as it removes the Abrahamic constraints (chains) of belief so I can see things as they are, rather through someone elses rose colored lenses. Thats just me, but it works for me. Others can believe as they choose.

Indeed ! 'Abrahamic constraints ' are deep inside three of the world's major religions !

 

[FireBorn]

Not really , that came through later redaction in Zoroastrianism . If you read the earliest Avesta ' good and bad ' are qualities of 'mind ' ; Mainyu - spenta mainyu or angra mainyu . Then Mainyu became 'spirits' , then it went into duality in deity ( which is rubbish , even in Zoroastrianism as its (earlier ) Mono deistic . They admit mainyu IS mind , but ..... blah blah blah
( 'justifications ' ) . When the earliest Avestas are read with this original interpretation , it comes off more like Buddhism, in that it can be seen as 'a science of the mind ' .

Of course good and bad was what was good for them and what was not . Way before that going right back it was about
Man as wild animal Vs Man as Social / tribal animal : hind brain VS fore brain ; Individual ' Id ' Vs ' Group ' etc . It is all relative but the original concept was about how and why one's mind can go 'bad ' ( selfish , anti social , disrupting the collective ) or good , supporting it . It's the essential of initiation ; learning what base things you need to give up to get the advantages of the specific group .

Prior to him ? Nah there was still 'evil ' anything from the invading Indo Europeans , through to the Australian Aboriginals , were just about any misfortune was due to evil spirits .

If anything Zoroaster was ... nope ! It is all in your MIND . But it still got changed back to '' the Devil made me do it ! ''

Fair pushback. Let me reframe, the Israelites in captivity were exposed to the duality and good and evil concepts and then went nuclear with it in their now monotheistic religion. Now demons are evil, and hell is a place for bad people. Somehow Satan is the serpent, Lucifer is a being, the devil and the beast all the same entity (even though the watchers did way more damage to the world, being the reason for the flood and all according to the text).

Prior to that, they weren't monotheistic, demons weren't evil (in fact I think they were just spirits, not demons). Hell wasn't a place.

The underworld concept came from the Sumerians as best we can actually prove.

I dont know much about the Aboriginals to even speak on that. I will be tearing into them at some point to learn their religion and any occult offshoots if they exist.