• Hi guest! As you can see, the new Wizard Forums has been revived, and we are glad to have you visiting our site! However, it would be really helpful, both to you and us, if you registered on our website! Registering allows you to see all posts, and make posts yourself, which would be great if you could share your knowledge and opinions with us! You could also make posts to ask questions!

Remote Viewing Conumdrum

Mars

Zealot
Joined
Jan 26, 2024
Messages
165
Reaction score
258
Awards
4
Viewed the winner of a Games show before the end happened. Did the prediction somewhere else, not here and only the last few days I got the confirmation.

This led me down into philosophising. What if I let the winner know they win just at the time I got the impression. What if I would have told the other contestants this person would win.

Would they throw in the towel? Not care? Would it jeopardise the winner if they, knowing they'd win, just don't care?

I think you see where I am going with this. Its the age old, regurgitated and bland time travel paradox (also called temporal paradox) But with remote viewing.

"What if we go back in time to kill baby Stalin and save the world" But wait "Wouldn't this remove the need to go back in time in the firsf place?"


What if I would actively tell people their "future" as in, tell them events what will happen. Will they act differently? Jeopardise the event? Or cause it to happen?

The thing with Remote Viewing is, that it is absolute. You know time travel from movies and it is subject to many different colourful laws, but with remote viewing is that it is always "true". You see what will happen.
It will tell you the result of an event. No matter which. It is absolute.

So in order for this shenanigan to work, me telling someone what will happen is part of the view. But this is not how it works.

Here are some actual and tangible real world examples that I viewed:

I was at the park with my dog, another dog played with it. There was a tennis ball, I was about to throw the ball when it triggered, it was foresight technically but it is a remote viewing "discipline". It said "Throw the ball and you will get injured, it will be nasty and unpleasant".

I thought for a moment but then, "If I act against it, something will happen that assists in my ambitions". So I threw, knowing the result. Result was that the other dog attacked mine because of the ball, I had to intervene and save my dog, beat the other dog up but it bit my hand and stomach.

Thankfully not deeply or at arteries. Went to the ER and the day was wasted because of this. I thought perhaps the thing that "assists me" is a cute petite nurse named Diana, with black hair and blue eyes waiting for me in the ER fixing me up, falling in love with me and we end up doing onlyfans. But no, just svetlana with a massive belly. What a joke.

So this is usual a way how it works^ (too many svetlanas, not enough dianas in the world)

Now a specific view with the conundrum:

A specific lot that is empty will be bought by the local government and turned into a park/ playground. Because there is no buyer.

--

I am the only person in the world that knows what will happen to this lot right now. It is still for sale. What if I buy it instead and build a house there?

It is not possible for the Remote Viewing result to be wrong. However, my event with the dog that bit me showed me that it's possible to "choose" as witness. Not throwing the ball like rv told me, would have prevented the wasted afternoon and all that. It would have been a normal day.

Throwing the Ball however disrupted that normal day and made it become different. Like a different "path" I take.

If I buy the lot, will it also be a different "path"? This would not invalidate the remote viewing. Actually I just got a deja vu about this with the "different path".

Can I influence remote viewing results if I am the one who viewed them? "Witnessed them"?

Also because you now wonder, there is a time component to remote viewing (if you are proficient enough). So its not like its Schrödingers Lot, that turns into a playground either Tommorow or in 300.000 years. It will happen in 3 years.

So until then I could meddle with "destiny". Now "destiny" does not exist in Hermeticism nor Remote Viewing. So what is it then?

It is more like, all events thus far, and all coming ones, will lead up to the event that the lot will be bought by the local government and turned into a park/ playground.

I know this. I can change it? It would not violate anything but it would de-absolute the remote viewing result. But it is absolute. It can by definition not be wrong.

So something else, will I be prevented from buying the lot? No matter what I do? This is more like destiny isnt it?

Either this or the operator who viewed the event can interact with it.

I don't know what to think of it.

Other than trying different things out. What if I somehow got onboard a Russian Borei Nuclear submarine and at some point in the middle of the Atlantic I hit the button that starts the nuclear missiles towards new york? I should be able to confirm this right now, if I will do this.

And I can't see anything. Not a no. Not a yes.
So is it something I can choose? Or is it so ridiculous and unhinged that it cant even happen? Or is it that I get stopped at some point.

--

So what should I do? What will happen if I randomly tell people what will happen to them? I did so before and it was fine. But it was boring stuff. What if I told someone "Hey, if you dont stay at home right now you will get hit by a truck and die."
What will happen? I am the only one who knows about this. Does this mean I can prevent it? Or is it bound to happen.


However I had episodes where it did not care that I acted "against it" like other scenarios similar to the dog one from before. It was like "get there and do this. Dont say this" and I accidentally said what I should not have said and got fucked.

(What use is foresight if you are half of the time too dumb to properly register it, no one talks about that. "Oh it would be so cool seeing the future". Would you even realise you see it? Would you accept it?)


What do you think?
Post automatically merged:

If you want to hear something spooky, there was a case of someone viewing many things. Into the future too. Like a few years.

However he died before most of what he saw happened. It was then concluded that somehow "accessing the information of your future self" was not how remote viewing works. So basically, the operator did view events that happened after his death.

What does that add to this? He was there seeing it, despite being dead when it happens in the future.


In Hermeticism, there exists no time and space. Everything happens at the same time within the Planck Distance. Evola said this.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 16, 2021
Messages
174
Reaction score
394
Awards
7
The issue with knowing the future is that you could have either changed it by knowing, or caused it to happen by trying to change it.

That's why most divinations are fairly vague, especially when the recipient of said divination wholeheartedly believes in it. A skeptical recipient will probably dismiss the results until whatever was predicted will happen, so the divination getting a vague result doesn't really affect anything. Meanwhile if the recipient is super hardcore into it and wholeheartedly believes divination, the results will generally be vague so as to have more room for the result to actually occur. At least that's my thoughts on it, either hyper specific or super vague, in whichever way wouldn't change the outcome..
 

Mars

Zealot
Joined
Jan 26, 2024
Messages
165
Reaction score
258
Awards
4
The issue with knowing the future is that you could have either changed it by knowing, or caused it to happen by trying to change it.

That's why most divinations are fairly vague, especially when the recipient of said divination wholeheartedly believes in it. A skeptical recipient will probably dismiss the results until whatever was predicted will happen, so the divination getting a vague result doesn't really affect anything. Meanwhile if the recipient is super hardcore into it and wholeheartedly believes divination, the results will generally be vague so as to have more room for the result to actually occur. At least that's my thoughts on it, either hyper specific or super vague, in whichever way wouldn't change the outcome..

I am not a fan of this theory because something tells me this isn't true or fully true. I thought of something similar but no. "Dont say that".

I did not created Trump winning the election or Jake Paul winning the fight, or the aircraft carrier to be hit by a missile by yemenis.

I get outcomes by prompting. Not by divination or whatever.

Like an AI
Post automatically merged:

If so then I will create a black haired blue eyed petite girl named Diana to ring my door right now.
 

silencewaits

Zealot
Joined
Feb 15, 2025
Messages
102
Reaction score
97
Awards
1
What does that add to this? He was there seeing it, despite being dead when it happens in the future.

Nothing. The mechanics that allow us to do such things are not bound by the restraints of this physical universe. It's taking a step in n, instead of x, y, or z. There are more things beyond the space-time manifold, other forms of existence, but it is entirely alien to the viewpoint of most humans. Relying solely on linear understanding will fail you. But accounting for other dimensions beyond the three spatial dimensions plus the one linear dimension will allow you to realize the answers to your other questions.

Now "destiny" does not exist in Hermeticism nor Remote Viewing.

Destiny does exist in Hermeticism, at least in actual Hermeticism and not what was peddled in the Kybalion. The universe is supremely, superiorly ordered and intelligible. From Providence came Necessity, from Necessity comes Fate. I recommend researching the concept of logos, and the Tao. You will gain insights into the physical universe as well.
 
Top