• Hi guest! As you can see, the new Wizard Forums has been revived, and we are glad to have you visiting our site! However, it would be really helpful, both to you and us, if you registered on our website! Registering allows you to see all posts, and make posts yourself, which would be great if you could share your knowledge and opinions with us! You could also make posts to ask questions!

A Question on Left Hand Path Groups

Kramfort

Neophyte
Joined
Dec 28, 2024
Messages
5
Reaction score
5
Hello, I'm a little curious into how many Left Hand Path groups are out there. I wonder can they all be listed? How many do you know? At least if we first look at the contemporary day, and then we could speculate backward too, but that's a bit trickier to do, isn't it, since we don't find as much historical record of it?

Also what common denominators do we usually find among these Left Hand Path groups? What differences may we find? Some is probably basic, like a focus on self-deification, antinomianism, etc., but maybe there are different teachings and interpretations.
 

The God-King

The Mystical Rebel
Joined
Apr 20, 2021
Messages
375
Reaction score
802
Awards
14
How many are out there? No one knows. Can they all be listed? No. People make up new groups all the time. The only ones we hear about are the ones who get big or happen to have a prominent member or two that wrote a good book (or a few). We never hear about the LHP groups that was started by some freak and his wife and maybe one or two other weirdos in town and they practice in someone's basement.
 

Kramfort

Neophyte
Joined
Dec 28, 2024
Messages
5
Reaction score
5
True and that's a good thought. Yet maybe I can think about traditions of the LHP, like you have Satanic, Luciferian, etc... There can be many different groups but what about the traditions? So you have hundred different Luciferian or Satanic groups but they're still that.
 

Wintruz

Acolyte
Joined
Nov 4, 2023
Messages
393
Reaction score
1,544
Awards
15
True and that's a good thought. Yet maybe I can think about traditions of the LHP, like you have Satanic, Luciferian, etc... There can be many different groups but what about the traditions? So you have hundred different Luciferian or Satanic groups but they're still that.
Even within the designation "Traditional Satanism", there are difficulties with the idea of a monolithic tradition. This is because, by its very nature, Satanism, and the Left Hand Path generally, are deeply personal and highly individualistic. At the most sophisticated level, this is because the desires and inclinations, both of which are heavily used in Satanism, of all individuals are different. A less conscious manifestation of this might be precise interpretations of myths, figures and so on.

In short, categorising here is like herding cats. If you're interested in what a person is thinking, it's better to not presume and to approach considering this might be a highly personalised system (this might also be true of any religion).

If you are writing an academic-type piece, the convention has inclined towards broad categorisations into LaVeyan Satanism, theistic or Traditional Satanism, Setian and Luciferian movements. There are major problems with this but it's a broad-strokes approach. Some Evangelicals of the 1980s/1990s categorised Satanists into "dabblers" (an example would be Richard Ramirez), "religious" (an example would be the Temple of Set), "non-traditional" (an example might be Charles Manson) and "generational" (Michelle Smith's fictions are a literary account of this). These classifications have had some cultural weight but, ultimately, they're designed to serve the weltanschauung of maniacs.
 

Xenophon

Banned
Banned
Warned
Probation
Joined
Aug 17, 2023
Messages
2,992
Reaction score
3,698
Awards
16
Hello, I'm a little curious into how many Left Hand Path groups are out there. I wonder can they all be listed? How many do you know? At least if we first look at the contemporary day, and then we could speculate backward too, but that's a bit trickier to do, isn't it, since we don't find as much historical record of it?

Also what common denominators do we usually find among these Left Hand Path groups? What differences may we find? Some is probably basic, like a focus on self-deification, antinomianism, etc., but maybe there are different teachings and interpretations.
It's like Protestant churches in the U.S. The bold little band of true believers splinters off a church that splintered off a church that... And the first time a presbyter forgets and parks his car in the pastor's spot, they quarrel, and a small core of true believers splinter... The question is like asking how many Muslim extemist groups there are in the Middle East.
 

Kramfort

Neophyte
Joined
Dec 28, 2024
Messages
5
Reaction score
5
Okay... maybe the question doesn't work because I see your views it's such a manifold complicated subject to trace. However if we think about different types of Left Hand Path teachings instead of traditions or groups... what can one find then? I know antinomian ideas, self-deification etc, but how many agree on all those points and what type of different LHP teachings can one find? There must be some general trends, some larger points of view on it. It's just carbon copy of each other if not, is it not? I hope this gets closer to what I mean by question I posed.
 

Wintruz

Acolyte
Joined
Nov 4, 2023
Messages
393
Reaction score
1,544
Awards
15
Okay... maybe the question doesn't work because I see your views it's such a manifold complicated subject to trace. However if we think about different types of Left Hand Path teachings instead of traditions or groups... what can one find then? I know antinomian ideas, self-deification etc, but how many agree on all those points and what type of different LHP teachings can one find? There must be some general trends, some larger points of view on it. It's just carbon copy of each other if not, is it not? I hope this gets closer to what I mean by question I posed.
The two points you mention, self-deification and antinomianism, are essential to all iterations and they are interlinked. The first step in self-deification is to reject what you have already been told you are, usually your social roles and the internalised pressure that comes with them ("My mother might be an abusive drunk but as her son it would be wrong to hold her to a higher standard", "My boss takes advantage of me but it's OK because God will fix it all in the end if I'm just a good worker", etc., etc.). Although these things are complex (for example, a devout Christian, Muslim or Buddhist might reject the thoughts I've set out above every bit as much as a LHPer might) and highly individual, and although it's a bit immature to go around categorising life under Left Hand Path vs Right Hand Path, I would say that if those two points are not there it would be very difficult to recognise it as the Left Hand Path, whatever else it might be.

In one of his books, Christopher Wallis considers the tantric approach to be two-fold. First and foremost, it is a path to liberation. Secondly, it is a path to enhance pleasure in Life. This could equally apply to the Western Left Hand Path. It is about discovering the True Self and then creating a world in which the Will of that Self is perfect and, in a sense, absolute. It is, then, a Path to creating self-aware monarchs. This can, of course, be done with varying degress of wisdom: from a Anton LaVey/Norma Desmond-type who has become a god but who rules her kingdom through denial of reality (and thus finds it collapsing on her) or it could be done with profound wisdom and insight and openness to new impulses as is seen with Odin or the vampires of Michael Talbot's The Delicate Dependency.

In addition to the two points you mention, I would say the Western Left Hand Path has some other features but not everyone would agree with me:
  1. Magic. And a very pragmatic approach to magic at that. The LHP, like chaos magic, usually focuses on results. Many on the Left Hand Path call their results magic as "sorcery" and longer-term psychological change as "initiatory magic" but it would be a very, very odd LHPer who denounced using sorcery when the occasion called for it. This can include destructive magic, though mature magicians use that sparingly and only after other options have been exhausted.
  2. Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
    or Initiation. Another way of saying this could be self-discovery and self-transformation in the process of that self-discovery.
  3. Self-strengthening. The most profound secrets of the LHP come after creating a kind of strengthening-energy-feedback-loop, where you send your Will out and it manifests in ways that perpetually make you stronger, in an ever upwards rising spiral, giving you greater capacity to act upon the world (better results from magic, greater self-discipline, making you "lucky", etc.).
  4. "Dark" imagery. This is not universally agreed upon. Much like our Buddhist siblings in the East, there are some who use the symbols of Light in Left Hand Path ways. I once met a highly intelligent and successful LHP adept who used, of all things, the Virgin Mary as his primary initiatory model (don't ask me to explain it!). This might be a way of working through some psychological baggage or bringing balance to a life that's overdone it in some areas but it carries a very real problem. Major symbols are not just personal repositories but collective ones too. If you invoke the Virgin Mary, you invoke two-thousand years worth of energy that everyone in the world associates with her, almost all of it intrinsically opposed to self-deification and antinomianism. Imagery that is also antinomian gets us around this problem. If you invoke Satan, you invoke two thousand years of outsider energy and energy that is conducive to self-deification.
Different symbols do different things for different people. In the West today we can choose currents in accordance with what is most resonant with our needs or even what might most challenge those needs. This has led to different expressions of the Left Hand Path, each one having different emphases and drawing from different cultural contexts. Here are some that have the most acolytes:
  • Satanism. Not everyone uses Satanism in an initiatory way. For some, it's self-conscious dress up (Church of Satan post-LaVey, Satanic Temple, etc.) and for others it's essentially inverted Christianity. There are groups though who use it as a powerful expression of the Left Hand Path ideas outlined above. Usually these are categorised under "Traditional Satanism" (the original ONA is a good example of this).
  • Setian/Temple of Set.
  • Thelema. I would unhesitatingly argue that the core tenants of Thelema as expressed by Crowley meet the definitions laid out above.
  • The Fourth Way. This is usually, bizarrely, called Right Hand Path. It's principles are deeply Left Hand Path and, actually, often quite Socially Darwinist.
  • Tantra, Sufism and Zoroastrianism. Again, often characterisied as monolithically Right Hand Path, there are some currents within these traditions that meet the above definition of Left Hand Path.
  • Odinism.
  • Neo-Nazism. This gets thorny: most people in this political subculture are far from Left Hand Path adepts but it has been used by some very advanced LHP magi as a way of doing Work. The principles of National Socialism, especially early on, in the Völkisch movement and the SS, do have strong parallels with Left Hand Path but it's not a perfect fit.
  • Vampyrism.
  • Chaos magic. This is especially the case when the personal "undoing" aspects are tied to the Fourth Way (as in peripheral Chaos figures like Christopher Hyatt, RAW, etc.).
 

Nocturne

Traveler
Benefactor
Joined
Jan 21, 2025
Messages
12
Reaction score
11
Awards
1
I think a big part of the LHP is that it should be decentralised and unique (not reliant on groups, which normally turn out to have ulterior motives), just the individual making their own path and taking knowledge from other places that serves them and disregarding what doesn’t. In that sense I would say Luciferianism’s core tenets are the closest to it
 
Top