• Hi guest! As you can see, the new Wizard Forums has been revived, and we are glad to have you visiting our site! However, it would be really helpful, both to you and us, if you registered on our website! Registering allows you to see all posts, and make posts yourself, which would be great if you could share your knowledge and opinions with us! You could also make posts to ask questions!

Book – PDF Benjamin Rowe - The Enochian Magick Reference

Share a PDF of a book.

HoldAll

Librarian
Staff member
Librarian
Joined
Jul 3, 2023
Messages
5,061
Reaction score
25,386
Awards
16
Benjamin Rowe (1952 – 2002) was an American Kaballist and ceremonial magician who published numerous articles on the Kabbalah and the magical system communicated to Dr. John Dee by angels known as Enochian magic. He incorporated Golden Dawn components into his version of the system and drew from the ritual structure laid out by Frater Achad. He was one of the few Enochian magicians who did ritual work and published his findings. He was active on the Internet under his own name and under the alias of Josh Norton. The Enochian Magick Reference describes a history of Enochian magic derived from occult methods that Elizabethan scholar John Dee and seer Edward Kelly claimed were revealed from the spirits from 1851 and 1885.
The devices revealed to them for occult use are described.

A history of how others used, developed and changed their system follows. These include
  • Elias Ashmole
  • The Golden Dawn Magickal Society
  • Aleister Crowley
  • The Aurum Solis magickal order
  • the Church of Satan and the Temple of Set
  • The Oder of the Cubic Stone
Then follows a discussion of the Enochian magic’s relationship to Necronomicon, the Book of Enoch, and the Apocalypse.

The book is short and is intended as a reference.

Note: This is a practice-oriented work, definitely not a history book!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Last edited:

HoldAll

Librarian
Staff member
Librarian
Joined
Jul 3, 2023
Messages
5,061
Reaction score
25,386
Awards
16
1851 and 1885? Or 1581 and 1585?
No idea what that means but in any case, please don't comment on the content of books in this section.
 

ThomsonI

Neophyte
Joined
Mar 8, 2022
Messages
16
Reaction score
29
No idea what that means but in any case, please don't comment on the content of books in this section.
Sorry I wasn't clearer. It's not about the content of the book but the description in this thread. There's a typo in the description, second to last sentence of the first paragraph.
 
Top