I don't think so. Those are all different systems, and even within those systems opinions differ. The early Jewish Kabbalists often disagreed amongst each other, e.g. how to map the human body to the Tree of Life - the standard model which after Luria slowly emerged has Netzach & Hod as the right and left leg respectively (so has Dion Fortune btw), so attributing it to Manipura would be something of a stretch. There was also the debate whether the Supernal Triad should be projected onto the physical body at all because these sephiroth were already half-transcendent (and there goes Ajna… or does it?). Some rabbis didn't even include Keter on the Tree because they equated it with Eyn Sof and put Da'at on top instead. I read somewhere that many Hindu gurus categorically refuse to talk about Sahasrara, which would correspond to that Keter/Eyn Sof opinion, so that fits. A crown is something you put on your head, it's not part of your head itself.
What the Western Tradition should have learned from the chaos magic paradigm is to employ syncretism selectively, not in the old theosophical/universalist way. For example, I still desperatly cling to the idea that Manipura arises from the tension between Netzach and Hod but have recently learned how dead wrong the attribution of the seven classical planets to the sephiroth from a classic Jewish Kabbalist standpoint was, so I ditched it. Netzach isn't at all like Venus, Hod is nothing like Mercury, so learning more about those sephiroth from these old rabbis while ignoring the traditional Western Qabbalist correspondences is the way to go for me and might teach me more about the chakras as well.
Another example: I would put the Hara between Muladhara and Svadhisthana but refuse to equate it with Yesod despite the obvious 'foundation' meaning, it just feels wrong to me. I think insisting on artificial uniformity will result in even more confusion than a highly individualized understanding. We're talking about mysticism, after all, so a bit of fuzziness should'nt unsettle us here.
