- Joined
- Jan 28, 2025
- Messages
- 116
- Reaction score
- 81
- Awards
- 2
Alot of it would be personal bias towards him. I know Steven Skinner is very critical about him — i would not say he is the ignorant type based on the ammount of work he has done with studying western ceremonial magick and greco-egyptian magick.I've already done the work, I just saw a video from somebody talking about how "weird and impossible" Abramelin is so wanted to put forth my theory as to why this idea exist. Liber LXV is great, personally even as a non-Thelemite I have a great appreciation for Crowley's work - but most people into traditional Western magick (whether due to ignorance or personal bias) don't take him seriously.
The way i personally see him is that he was looking for attention which is primarily the reason he has that evil persona attached to him. He did start getting attention in a bad way and then he looked to inflate that attention. Of course i do not exactly know if im right here, but this is my assumption.
Post automatically merged:
Personally i am not a fan of his work — not to say some parts do not present any value. I liked austin osman spare a bit more if we are to be talking about modern writers.Alot of it would be personal bias towards him. I know Steven Skinner is very critical about him — i would not say he is the ignorant type based on the ammount of work he has done with studying western ceremonial magick and greco-egyptian magick.
The way i personally see him is that he was looking for attention which is primarily the reason he has that evil persona attached to him. He did start getting attention in a bad way and then he looked to inflate that attention. Of course i do not exactly know if im right here, but this is my assumption.