Author Discussion on Baron and Baronessa Araignee's occult material

[coffee221]

I want to discuss their works and also them as authors. For as much as i complain about them i also find their work extremely interesting... and frustrating. For example:
I like the recent planetary talisman work as a simple spellbook i can always draw from. However much of the sigil art and even some text seems AI generated. Why not put in the effort of drawing it yourself?

Their LHP focused books have a lot of obnoxious edge to them. "This book will kill you if you misuse it, not for dabblers" feels like overkill.

Some content simply isn't explained in the book it's in (the mention of using Graves oil in the book of Azarak, that you would only know what it is if you have also read the Gospel of the Ghouls) or is incredibly impractical.

I will however say there is good stuff in the less edgy books. The book of Azarak was very enjoyable, even if a bit basic. I'm currently starting Magus vol 2 and like their explanations on astrology. Little Gods has some of its proceeds donated to animal shelters and they have a free occult library.

What are your opinions?

 

[josehumbertomj]

I've learned a lot from these authors through their forum posts, old blog and books over the past few years. Their booklets have provided valuable practical insights that I've incorporated into my practice. While not entirely groundbreaking, I appreciate their concise approach to topics, which has saved me time and money on other books.

Their complete magical systems are more controversial. I also recently purchased Magus. Having practiced angelic magic for some years now (almost daily), I disagree with many statements in Volume I, particularly regarding the enochian angels. Volume II, however, is an excellent astrological reference that goes beyond talismanic applications (has already become my main source of research).

Regarding their works on the LHP, I considered purchasing "The Book of Dead Names," but reconsidered after reflection. While they emphasize the big dangers of the system, I question its advantages. Why risk so much if the results seem comparable to those of any other magical system?

I greatly respect their experience and work, and highly recommend their subject-specific books. However, implementing their complete magical systems is a personal decision that each practitioner must evaluate individually.

 

[coffee221]

I've learned a lot from these authors through their forum posts, old blog and books over the past few years. Their booklets have provided valuable practical insights that I've incorporated into my practice. While not entirely groundbreaking, I appreciate their concise approach to topics, which has saved me time and money on other books.

Their complete magical systems are more controversial. I also recently purchased Magus. Having practiced angelic magic for some years now (almost daily), I disagree with many statements in Volume I, particularly regarding the enochian angels. Volume II, however, is an excellent astrological reference that goes beyond talismanic applications (has already become my main source of research).

Regarding their works on the LHP, I considered purchasing "The Book of Dead Names," but reconsidered after reflection. While they emphasize the big dangers of the system, I question its advantages. Why risk so much if the results seem comparable to those of any other magical system?

I greatly respect their experience and work, and highly recommend their subject-specific books. However, implementing their complete magical systems is a personal decision that each practitioner must evaluate individually.

Thank you for all this! Would you be willing to elaborate on the disagreements you have with Magus Volume I?