We've had these incidents in the Forum Library where somebody posted links to two collections with more than 1,500 books in total, everything from alchemy to zen. Everyone was grateful until somebody spotted some racist and white-supremacist tracts among them. We asked the member to remove them and that was that. When I was still posting books and went hunting for book caches, I noticed that most conspiracy-nut collections often featured right-wing extremist and anti-semitic stuff as well, for example the
Protocols of the Elders of Zion or Hitler's
Mein Kampf. Did those collectors read all that crap out of academic interest or were they right-wing extremists? No idea. Then there was this guy who posted some Joy of Satan pamphlets which also contained neonazi stuff. As far as I remember, we took most them down, they were nothing but pop Satanist propaganda anyway.
It should be borne in mind that different countries handle the right to freedom of speech differently and that the US model is by no means universal. Disseminating neonazi propaganda, displaying nazi insignia, tattoos or the Hitler salute in public, denying the Holocaust, etc. can get you to prison in some EU countries for historical reasons; rare debates there revolve around the modalities of the statutes' application, freedom of speech never comes into it. These countries have been 'anti-fascist' since 1945, not always consistently so right after the war but formally nevertheless, so these JoS guys should better be careful where they show their swastika tats on their European holidays or they'll be arrested within minutes.
As for 'capitalist'… I see it as the prevalent state of affairs, not as a definite movement with a clearcut ideology. From what I've gathered from friends who had escaped from former Eastern Bloc countries, the Communist Parties there thought that occultism benefitted capitalism because it prevented workers from developing class awareness and rising up against their oppressors, and consequently banned every expression of it. I think they were mistaken, from what I gather from Forum discussions, many members are highly political, just not always in the way those post-war Communist Parties naively expected.
Scholars in the academic world, on the other hand, are woke to the extreme and appear to like nothing better than calling each other some kind of '-ist' or another and accusing each other of various '-isms' once they start argueing (I'm reading mostly scholarly books right now in the hope of finding more reliable information than in purely esoteric tomes); I frequently even have to look up some those '-isms' to understand what they're bickering about.
'Patriarchy': Many witches call themselves feminists, and I don't think I've ever read a modern male occult author pining for the old days where women knew their place (plenty of such authors in the past though!). In line with old-school Communist theory and second-wave feminists like
, I guess you could call
all occult books specifically directed at women and distracting them from their fight against the patriarchy 'fascist' (or some other kind of '-ist'); seen from this black-and-white perspective,
all of occultism is a tool of the patriarchy to subjugate women. Fortunately, those days of top-down feminism are long past, and you have to decide for yourself if the contents of a book violates your personal value code.
I guess you could call even
this reply 'paternalistic'. I can't help it, I'm a guy, and in the same way many writers probably 'serve the capitalist patriarchy' without even noticing; I don't think they're doing it on purpose though.