Every statement has a value, but from a the perspective that whatever you think or not you are right, doesn't make sense for me enter to a post about crystals if you don't believe in them.
Therefore, this post is about collect experiences from ppl who appreciate the crystals, the rythm, and the vibration.
The problem with human beings is that everybody wants results fast with evidence like a sign, but all the signals/marks are there but not in a physical way, we want to see much from a perspective of many but when we will be able to catch the less that means much everything will change.
So this post is not about not believers.
If one has worked with crystals and has no results, he probably turns sceptical. In this case, his IS most assuredly an opinion worth taking into account. It's called "evidence." Maybe it's not conclusive evidence, but it's evidence all the same.
A certain strain of critic claims to appreciate Schoenberg's compositions, indeed to hear in them music. Others harbor deep reservations. You can scarcely begin an evaluation of that degenerate cacaphony/innovative new style by discounting one group or the other at the outset.
Sure, if one wants to really study crystals, he has to listen to and learn from the yea-sayers. This scarcely means the nay-sayers have nothing to add. A vast number of early chemists had compiled a lot of evidence for the subtle element phlogiston before nay-sayer Priestley knocked 'em into a cocked hat.
Helpful Hermetic Hint: Quickly scan new posts. When you spot words like "no," "waste time," or "bull****," close your eyes really, really tight and pass on to the next post. See there? Works well, dunnit? So well you'd swear it was---fondle your crystal balls and stroke that quartzite spire---magic!