Hi guest! As you can see, the new Wizard Forums has been revived, and we are glad to have you visiting our site! However, it would be really helpful, both to you and us, if you registered on our website! Registering allows you to see all posts, and make posts yourself, which would be great if you could share your knowledge and opinions with us! You could also make posts to ask questions!
OK, Crowley gets little love in the forum. Still, he was---and remains--- immensely influential. So let's try saying something good about him. And no, saying "He had a wonderful head of hair in his youth" won't cut it.
ME: First, he had a pretty damned fine writing style (though organizational ability lags.) He had bigger balls than mine being the Alpine mountaineer he was. His working up the exhaustive lists of correspondences he did was quite a feat, and one useful---even though his work is not the last word here.
Uncle AL, as I call him, was a consummate magician. Knowing that words are magic so you can't use words to describe magic, he writes obliquely. In fact, he has a great sense of humour and writes with his tongue firmly in his cheek; or probably Vicky's cheek! Crowley's writing doesn't make sense until you do the magic yourself then you realise you can't take him on face value. He also uses a lot of codes to hide what he's doing.
I enjoy a lot of his writings on Ceremonial Magick and specifically Magick without Tears.
I don’t really ever feel the need to bring him up good or bad though because he is divisive as a topic of conversation.
I have not really ever had a strong pull towards Thelema especially because I’ve more than had my fill of Religion in this life.
But a person can learn a lot from Crowley’s path of Attainment.
The AA and OTO both have incredibly long Reading/Study lists and if nothing else a person could be exposed to some differing philosophical views and Methods.
Post automatically merged:
I in my ignorance was not previously aware of Crowley resorting to Animal Sacrifice.
As it relates to our discussions in the thread on that topic.
I think that's the very point I am trying to make, but you did it better & with a sense of hunmour too.
Post automatically merged:
I tried to edit this into the above, but because it took me longer than 5 minutes to write it was not allowed.
So here we go - I come to Praise Aleister, not bury him - so had better get on with it
Crowley frightens a lot of people because I think that even today he makes them feel inadequate, pure & simple. They struggle to understand what he has written, cannot begin to understand the context in which it was written and hate him because they cannot comprehend his writing.
Solution? He must be far right, of course!
I don't need to tell the more widely read amongst us this, but before Crowley started publishing The Equinox, magickal manuscripts were by & large just that - manuscripts, and you had to make your own copies (often of copies themselves) which is why there are so many variations of certain texts such as the Key of Solomon, Lemegeton, Liber Juratus and so on ad nauseam. Yes, it could be argued that Israel Regardie did a better job of the editing when 'Gems from The Equinox' was published, but The Equinox itself carries things that Regardie left out (The Temple of Solomon The King, the various 'special supplements' such as Levi's 'The Key of The Mysteries') although my first version of The Equinox was indeed 'Gems' as in the 1980's it was almost impossible finding copies of the original 10 volumes, even the 2 volume Weiser reprint was in the many hundreds of pounds & believe me, £500 in the 1980's was a hell of a lot more to find than it is these days!
When I was Neophyte, I had to read as much as I could get my hands on and rapidly discovered that most published books are not worth the paper they are printed on and the first book that I thought was actually worth the purchase price & more besides was Book 4, part 3 - Theory & Practise. Finally things started to make sense to me and not just in a dry way, but with a sense of humour - far, far too many people always take Crowley at his written word when it should be obvious that he is simply taking the piss out of not only you, the reader, but also himself! This is plan for even the dullest intellect in his Autohagiography (and probably the reason it's almost impossible to buy a copy of it these days, too).
There is nobody who cannot fail to learn from Crowlety if only they would approach his writing as it was meant to be taken without trying to cram him into the modern woke ideal of a no-ball retard who is ashamed of who he is. Crowley was never ashamed of who he was - but neither did he take himself as seriously as some people appear to do.