• Hi guest! As you can see, the new Wizard Forums has been revived, and we are glad to have you visiting our site! However, it would be really helpful, both to you and us, if you registered on our website! Registering allows you to see all posts, and make posts yourself, which would be great if you could share your knowledge and opinions with us! You could also make posts to ask questions!

Magick through Jungian perspective?

cassianogpaiva

Neophyte
Joined
Oct 10, 2023
Messages
42
Reaction score
249
Hey guys!
Lately, I've been thinking about possible correlations between the symbolic system and Jungian archetypes. I would like to explore this further. Is there a book, article, etc., on this subject? If not, what would you suggest for this endeavor?
Manu thanks!!
 

Robert Ramsay

Apostle
Joined
Oct 1, 2023
Messages
1,068
Reaction score
2,284
Awards
8
I haven't read this book yet, but from what I know of it, it might have at least some of what you're looking for:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Yes, this (and possibly the Black Book) are what you should be reading.

But, of course, the most important thing is to be Jung at heart. :D
 

aviaf

Apprentice
Joined
Feb 5, 2023
Messages
93
Reaction score
239
Awards
2
Hey guys!
Lately, I've been thinking about possible correlations between the symbolic system and Jungian archetypes. I would like to explore this further. Is there a book, article, etc., on this subject? If not, what would you suggest for this endeavor?
Manu thanks!!
I’ve spent months at a time reading nothing but Jung, filling notebooks with notes and journals. If you want to explore magick through a Jungian lens, start with Man and His Symbols. It’s the clearest map of how symbols bridge conscious and unconscious, laying out archetypes like Shadow, Anima/Animus, and Self in ways you can apply directly to ritual practice.

Once you’ve got that grounding, move into The Red Book. That’s Jung’s raw visionary work, active imagination sessions where he wrestled with archetypal figures directly. Reading it after Man and His Symbols gives you the framework to decode the chaos, and for magicians it’s like watching Jung perform invocation inside his own psyche. If you want to go even deeper, check out the Black Books. They’re the raw notebooks behind The Red Book, his unfiltered record of visions and archetypal dialogues, closer to a ritual journal than a textbook. Just be warned, none of this is light reading, Jung cracked himself open and recorded visions, dialogues, and paintings in full mythic intensity. It can take months or years, and if you’re anything like me you’ll try it yourself just to see if he’s full of shit. Spoiler, he’s most definitely not! There’s a lot of “what the fuck did I just read” moments, and after trying it on for size some definite “what the fuck just happened” ones too. That’s part of the ride, and I can (and do 😆) talk about this stuff endlessly with anyone willing to dive in. Maybe I should start a thread on it? I'm sitting in a hospital waiting room, nothing else to do for the next hour and a half... the only reason I haven't already is this is heavy reading and a lot of people know about shadow work and invoke his name, but most people don't actually dive into his work for some reason. Disappointing, but also just makes it fun to explain it to them.
 

albie

Apprentice
Joined
Jul 3, 2025
Messages
71
Reaction score
51
He was pretty weird. Maybe even crazy. Good lad.
 

aviaf

Apprentice
Joined
Feb 5, 2023
Messages
93
Reaction score
239
Awards
2
It does not surprise me in the slightest that no one has really said anything since my last post on this topic 2 months ago. Disappointing...
Honestly, the thing people miss when they name‑drop Jung in magical spaces is that his work isn’t just psychology. It’s a usable magical technology if you know how to handle it. The man basically reinvented half of Western occultism from the inside out without ever calling it that.
If you’re a magician, here’s what you can actually do with Jung’s material:

Active Imagination = Invocation without the robes.
Jung wasn’t “visualizing.” He was entering a controlled trance, calling up an archetypal presence, dialoguing with it, and letting it speak back. That’s invocation. That’s pathworking. That’s inner temple work. And he documented the whole thing like a scientist who accidentally wandered into the astral.

Archetypes = the gods you already know, just wearing psychological names.
Shadow, Anima, Wise Old Man, Trickster: these aren’t metaphors. They’re psychic structures with their own gravity. When you work with Odin, Hecate, Hermes, Lucifer, whoever, you’re interacting with an archetype whether you call it that or not. Jung just gives you a map of the terrain.

The Red Book = a magician’s grimoire written by someone who didn’t realize he was writing one.
If you read it with magical eyes, it’s basically a record of initiatory ordeals, inner contacts, ego death cycles, and mythic encounters. It’s messy, raw, and absolutely recognizable if you’ve ever done deep ritual or ordeal work.

The Black Books = the closest thing we have to Jung’s magical diary.
Not polished. Not edited. Just the raw encounters. If you’ve ever kept a ritual journal, you’ll recognize the rhythm instantly.

And the biggest takeaway for magicians:

Jung gives you a way to work with spirits, gods, and inner figures without needing to “believe” in anything.
You can treat them as autonomous psychic intelligences and the results don’t get weaker, they get stronger because you’re speaking the language the unconscious actually listens to.

From a magical perspective, Jung gives you:
  1. a map of the inner world
  2. a method for contacting it
  3. a way to integrate what you find
  4. and a framework that keeps you from getting lost in your own symbolism
That’s why I keep coming back to him.
That’s why I filled notebooks.
That’s why I still end up in “what the hell just happened” territory when I use his methods in ritual.
If people actually read Jung instead of just quoting “shadow work” memes, half the magical community would level up overnight.

If anyone shows some interest, I can absolutely start a thread breaking down how to use Jungian techniques in ritual, ordeal, invocation, and identity work. I’ve got time this week, I'm at my cabin at the top of the Ozarks, alone with my dog in the middle of the woods, and can't spend ALL of my time fishing (just most of it, lol the browns are practically jumping in the boat) and this is one of those topics I can talk about until someone physically drags me away from the keyboard.
 
Joined
Sep 22, 2025
Messages
160
Reaction score
143
Awards
1
Jung tried to turn alchemy into a process of psychological healing. Whereas alchemy (in its truest form) is about literally creating an immortal subtle body.

I can't imagine anything more 'harmful' to an esoteric aspirant.
 

MorganBlack

Acolyte
Joined
Nov 18, 2024
Messages
476
Reaction score
1,094
Awards
8
Damn, just seeing this. Jung is rad. My two cents, and where I 'put' Jung.

I agree with ya'll the psychology-only interpretation of his work is given too much air time by boring people trying to tame him, and he is far more of a magician than people give him credit for. In my Neoplatonic view he maps how human psychology shapes the World Soul - how our software becomes externalized hardware.

I draw from Bernardo Kastrup and Patrick Harpur here. If, as Kastrup argues, reality is essentially 'transpersonal mind' and we are all just 'dissociated alters' of that one mind, then the archetypes aren't just private thoughts, they are the underlying patterns of the Universe's own psyche. As Harpur would say, we live in the Anima Mundi (World Soul). We’ve forgotten that the world is a 'Daimonic' place, a middle realm where mind and matter are the same substance.

For example: Astrology is the planets as Archetypes driving Synchronicity. Even if you don't 'believe' in it, the often patterns of your life events unfold according to the seemingly silly, arbitrary arrangement of planets. That is humanity - all of us - warping reality based on our instinctual human patterns over a very very long time. The planets reflect us as we turned them into gods with human qualities, as expressions of our humaness, our concerns, our, our instincts and sense of things ... and so they are that... is a very 'real' way. But they are both in us and outside us. Well, just as we are. In a Kastrupian-to-Neoplatonic sense, the planets , while now being 'gods,' are also external indicators of our very very deep process, shared by us all in external-internal state of the One. We have already colonized the stars with ourselves.
 
Top