Some practice targets would be nice, actually.
I've done probably thousands of remote viewing targets. This is not how you want to start this out, both for yourself and for anyone doing the remote viewing. And if what I'm throwing at you is a bit much, then let me know and I can spin this up with a more standardized design in another thread.
In short, you don't want to frontload the target. You've told me that it's an object - already I'm thinking with my rational brain about what it might be and effectively spoiled a session. I shouldn't know anything about the target at all. It could be Mars, it could be a little yellow and green figurine in a ж shape, it could be sound waves when playing a phonograph on August 12, 1892. I should know only a set of coordinate numbers, which can be called a target ID or objective ID.
The objective ID should be around 6-8 numbers only, randomly selected. Mash the keyboard type stuff. The Tasker (you with a target you want viewed) should write down the objective ID and write down the target description in detail, and/or provide a picture.
For example: 8395-3785: The viewer will describe the bag of chips on my kitchen table at 14:07 on Sunday, Dec 21, 2025. The viewer will describe the bag of chips ONLY.
OR
8395-3785 - The viewer will describe the Leaning Tower of Pisa in Pisa, Italy, at the time of the photo was taken used on the Wikipedia page. The viewer will describe the tower and its surroundings ONLY.
Then when you post, you post "Hey everyone, here's an objective to view: 8395-3785"
No other info should be provided. This keeps everyone blind to the objective, preventing analytic overlay (rational brain scraps of garbage) from getting in there.
But why do all this other stuff?
First, it ensures that everyone is looking at the same object at the same time. If you move your object, or leave and turn off the lights and we say it's in a dark space, or a place is described with sunny weather then rainy weather, who is right? The tasker wants consistency so it's easier to know when viewers are on target.
Second, you MUST provide viewers with feedback. It's critical to practice and training. Not all remote viewing data is right - no one ever gets 100% accuracy. So you as the tasker are responsible with looking at data and interpreting it. Meaning you want a clear picture of every element of the objective to make it easier on you. If you just say "Leaning Tower of Pisa" and some people get water, you are responsible for checking the weather and ask when they did the session before telling them right or wrong.
Why end with "ONLY."? Because if the target is boring and there's something with more entropy nearby, viewers check out the cool thing and not the target. It makes a noticeable difference in tasking.
You also want to provide feedback within a week or so.
Again, I'm happy to start up a remote viewing practice thread and you're welcome to post a target in there. I can link to some training manuals as well - the reddit /r/remoteviewing manual is pretty good, actually. And you're right that we should have some active practice targets for people.
