- Joined
- Aug 17, 2026
- Messages
- 2
- Reaction score
- 1
what’s ur personal opinion on the back ground/history of anticosmic satanism
Self-reinforcing severe depression masquerading as metaphysics.what’s ur personal opinion on the back ground/history of anticosmic satanism
Nah, I just remembered Dave Mustaine. I take back that last part.What interests me about anti-cosmic Satanism is that it seems to be asking a different question than most other forms of Satanism.
I don't think it has to mean that pleasure, beauty or good things don't exist. Obviously they do. The question is whether their existence automatically makes the cosmic order itself something good. And I don't really see it as simple nihilism. The basic idea seems pretty clear to me: the cosmos means order, limitation, conditioning; chaos is supposed to be something prior to, or outside, all of that. Whether that actually makes sense is another question.
Same with the gnostic element. I wouldn't claim MLO is some direct continuation of ancient gnosticism, because it clearly isn't. But it obviously takes a bunch of gnostic themes and rebuilds them into something modern. I suppose a lot of the disagreement comes down to what "liberation" is supposed to mean in the first place. Living freely in the world? Or getting beyond the conditions of that world altogether? Neither definition strikes me as self-evident.
And as a general rule, none of this seems to require a shotgun.
Also, the catholic church attracts pedophiles; it doesn't spawn them in some basement under the Vatican. I suspect anti-cosmic stuff can work the same way. A worldview like this is probably going to attract some people who were already inclined to make spectacularly bad decisions. That doesn't necessarily mean the philosophy manufactured them from scratch.
Anyway, I miss Dissection and The Devil's Blood. I would've preferred it if they'd become evangelicals.
Yeah, the point is that it's rather untrue. There is nothing more limiting than disorder (not chaos, by the way, chaos is a form of order).The basic idea seems pretty clear to me: the cosmos means order, limitation, conditioning; chaos is supposed to be something prior to, or outside, all of that.
That's fair. I was using "chaos" in the way the anti-cosmic current itself uses the word, rather than meaning simple disorder or randomness.Yeah, the point is that it's rather untrue. There is nothing more limiting than disorder (not chaos, by the way, chaos is a form of order).
I mean, it goes down to the real definition of chaos. Chaotic systems are at least in certain respects unpredictable while still adhering to strict laws. Weather and smoke patterns, most of biology, even - though subtly - the motions of celestial bodies are chaotic.That's fair. I was using "chaos" in the way the anti-cosmic current itself uses the word, rather than meaning simple disorder or randomness.
And I agree that disorder isn't necessarily freedom at all. In practical terms it can be incredibly limiting.
Actually, your point makes the terminology more interesting, because if chaos itself still implies some kind of structure or order, then the whole cosmos/order vs chaos distinction becomes a lot less straightforward than it first appears.
I mean, it goes down to the real definition of chaos. Chaotic systems are at least in certain respects unpredictable while still adhering to strict laws. Weather and smoke patterns, most of biology, even - though subtly - the motions of celestial bodies are chaotic.
Freedom is the ability to take action, which in turn requires potential - an order. The "dividing light form darkness" if we want to use the ancient metaphor. Only then can the lifegiving entropy, which is the source of all complex structures, run its course.
Anticosmic guys have made some of my favorite music ever. I have fondness for Selim Lemouchi, in particular, he's a sort of anti-Saint to me. For the most part though anti-cosmic stuff seems like spiritually bypassing depression into a counterfeit enlightenment. As much as I respect Jon Noidtveidt as a musician, his interviews around his beliefs tended to be a bunch of psuedo-Nietzschean nonsense, not to mention he was a literaly murderer. These currents present themselves as circles of elite spiritual warriors, yet they lack the fortitude to cope with life's inherent tragedy and the pain of embodied existence. It's blackpilled anti-natalism dressed up in esoteric trappings, and like any blackpilled community it provides cover and avenues for infiltration by crypto-Fascists who'd love nothing more than seeing the non-white, non-western majority of humanity culled down to nothing.
Some of the ToTBL stuff is interesting, the Liber Falxifer trilogy and Book of Sitra Achra do look like very sophisticated systems of magic, though both are appropriated from other sources, the former from South American folk traditions, the latter from Kabbalah, particularly the work of Nathan of Gaza.
I was quite anti-cosmic myself at one time. My occult awakening began in a place where I was deeply despairing over the value of life and creation. The idea of escaping the world into infinite nothingness seemed attractive, but in retrospect it was mostly depression and suicidal ideation. It did lead me to goetia, traditional witchcraft, and the Nag Hammadi texts, both of which have brought me to a much better place, but that involved admitting how much my hatred of God and life was simply me projecting self-hatred onto the whole cosmos which is not a path towards real spiritual growth.
I don't think it's a path with nothing of value. The extremely aggressive energy of these currents can upend your whole world in my experience and if given good direction that can make for effective practice. Just don't destroy your soul in the attempt.
Potential does not exist in any way that's not order. Things need to be separated, excluded and restricted in order for any channels of action to exist.I agree that disorder by itself isn't freedom. But I don't think that necessarily creates a problem for the anti-cosmic idea. The conditioned ego isn't supposed to be the whole Self, and cosmic order can be understood as restricting an already existing potential by forcing it into particular forms.
Well, then there's some overarching order we don't perceive. This doesn't point towards any anticosmic ideas.I'm also not sure the order we perceive has to be fundamental. Nietzsche's point about concepts freezing a world of constant becoming seems relevant here. We need stable categories to function, but that doesn't necessarily mean reality itself is made of stable categories.
It certainly should not. I think the very idea, regardless of the packaging, is a very sad one. The fact that I notice it's easy to sell by certain means to certain personalities as uplifting or desirable doesn't do much to change that,And I wonder how much the aesthetics affect the way all this gets read. Terence McKenna could talk endlessly about ego death and dissolving ordinary categories and nobody assumes he means sitting in a basement wishing he was dead. Put similar ideas next to black metal, sigils and ritual Satanism and suddenly they look much more depressing. I know people who hear that whole Carpathian Forest atmosphere and sink into the sofa, and others who hear the same thing and feel more alive. Maybe some of it really is just winter people and summer people.