(current post is 1:1 from my blog, thinking it's not worth it to make a new whole thread for this if I can post it. I hope it is alright <3 )
Critique of Quareia: Genuine Inner contact mangled by a spiritualist?
Honestly I thought it would be a low-ball from me to make the first image the Inner Librarian the cover photo...haha
So this is a compilation of my of Critique Quareia, not in a disparaging way and I don't really want to bring it down in it's practical/good things in it, except that some parts and pieces in it you want to step back and not take it as a whole. I hope that this is blog isn't taken as an outright attack but a consideration instead of
jumping into it headfirst without thinking about it. In the provocative sense of Josephine I give a title that might not be so accurate
1. Unconventional names? Grindstone, Unraveller...Imprisoner? (Saturn/Pluto)
In Apprentice Module we are presented with a specific imagery of Saturn and Pluto which are the grindstone and the Unraveller and there's no problem with these concepts but it seize up or freeze their imagery into one "form" instead of allowing more varied form of manifestation to come through. I agree that there's a certain emphasis here on some forces, but I don't know if it validate the placement of these forces in pentagram-esque ritual like the LBRP-copycat. I personally don't think it is suitable to be invoking these forces or banging them out in this manner, but there' might be some benefit to working with these forces as excessively as they are presented. It might be my own misunderstanding of how it is taught but I don't genuinely understand why Saturn and Pluto are worked with extensively if not for a hidden ulterior motive or to rewire you to a different tandem/rhythm. Apprentice Module 2, Lesson 3:
Look up your planets again in relation to you standing in the centre of the chart/pentagram. Focus on the positions of Saturn and Pluto: make sure you know where they are in your natal chart, and where that puts them in relation to you standing in the room
2. Warning of Oath taking then implicit oath are presented.
Apprentice
Module 10, Lesson 8 we find the following passage
“Limiter, servant of the angel of Merciful Wisdom, tool of the Grindstone, I hold you in my right hand of justice and judgement. May my labours be merciful in true wisdom, and by holding you in my right hand, I submit my work and actions to my own scales and judgement from this day on.” [...] Remember, from now on, for the rest of your life, you have agreed to be judged in this life and to walk the path of the Mysteries. It is not a vow or a promise, it is acceptance and agreement. If you choose to walk away from that agreement, there is no punishment: you always have a choice. But remember, the path of the Mysteries will always be there in your life from now on, even if you choose not to be. Regardless of what you choose to do in your life, those dynamics will stay with you. If you step away from magic, those dynamics will still flow through your life in one way or another, and rather than make you a magician, they will move you towards being a better person. Think wisely before you act, and treat everything that happens in your life, for good and bad, as a stepping stone to wisdom and knowledge.
Now maybe this is an agreement but the framework or the context of stuff happening is very close to an oath. I personally felt the way that visionary magic was described was VERY close or akin to taking an oath.
3. Hate of Result Magic, Arbatel having some destructive magic forces in it, PGM is parasite ridden magic text.
and she have weird stuff to say about getting practical results:
If you try to dodge that growth process through results magic, you will not only end up magically weak and ineffective, but you will also start to slide down the long slope of degeneracy as a magician. For example, I have been in magic for nearly forty years, and I have connections with magicians all over the world. I have yet to meet a long-term results magician who is not broke, lonely, sick, depressed and screwed up. They all do well for a small number of years… and then the backlash comes home to roost.
I don't really know if this is a good approach or many of these opinions could be seen as controversial and challengingly blunt. I just think that there's more to it and sometime it feel like she's intentionally writing in this provocative manner to bring attention. No hate in anyway I just genuinely think it's not the best way you would be banging texts after texts in the same tone.
4.Closure
I have to be honest and say that everyone is human and these notes I have don't really remove or destroy all potential benefits from the systems, as
in term of ancestral veneration variation/change. I would just step back and think about the system as a whole because of culturally disassociating from her own "dressing" of tradition, if the system is Rosicrucian/cabbalist in nature and the signboards/markers are made ambiguous; there's something disingenuous going on. Maybe she's reestablishing the inner contact through a different "portal" or a different "gate". That's my main problem or crux that's bothering me, why is she trying to distance herself from her tradition? is there something wrong with the point of contacts she established before that she need to establish them a new for other people? is there a different intention? Is there some cultural rewiring or cultural apprehension of the systems she worked with that she previously? In a sense that's my closing statement. Tread carefully but don't miss out on some good insights and gems in her writings.