That European history since about 750 A.D. represents the efforts of the Merovingians to worm their way back into power.
The Lucifer Experiments! What the fuck, dude? Tell me about them speriments.Frankly, I think the "Lucifer Experiments" takes the cake, but I'm down to hear anything crazier.
The Lucifer Experiments! What the fuck, dude? Tell me about them speriments.
I don't know that detail. The simple fact the Merovingians were desposed apparently took the jam out of someone's donut. Someone more recent, I mean.Is that the one that like 60 or 70 years around that time is fake history?
So back in the day, there was a race of humanoids on Mars. They fucked up something called the Lucifer Experiment where they were trying to bend reality or something and it caused a mass extinction. Two "types" of people (in this case they're basically called Jews) end up escaping Mars to come fill in the last two "Sephir" in Humanity's tree of life, and they're trying to do it again. Hold on let me see if I can find a wiki or something
Well, there are a lot of crazy conspiracies that I encountered.
Besides Lucifer Rebellion I also encountered the MK Ultra and also Birds are not real conspiration.
That "Birds are not real" conspiration literally gave me a mindf****. Like, the author of the conspiracy, Mr. Peter McIndoe, considers the fact that birds are more like U.S. and world espionage drones.
Not gonna lie, that is some really crazy BS that one can ever hear
Well, technically, if we exclude MK ultra from the list (it proved to be real), Birds Aren't Real movement and conspiracy hub has its foundation as "solid" as the Flat Earth.Okay, MK Ultra and Birds Aren't Real aren't conspiracies, they're facts.
Well, technically, if we exclude MK ultra from the list (it proved to be real), Birds Aren't Real movement and conspiracy hub has its foundation as "solid" as the Flat Earth.
The Earth isn't flat and no, even though some birds were used by the U.S. for espionage purposes, still, not all birdos are fakes or espionage drones.
That made me laughin the 1980s, the CIA used chemical warfare to kill all the birds in the world and replace them with drones!!
It's TRUE. Why do you think that they always perch on electrical lines! It's to charge their batteries!!!
[In all seriousness, BAR is a fake conspiracy, a satire along the same lines as the Flying Spaghetti Monster. IIRC the main group literally has "This is satire" on their site.]
thanks for that, ill have a looksee hereOkay, not a wiki, but I found an excerpt
Fuck, the more I read it the crazier it gets
I just had a disturbing thought. One sees people always charging smart phones. Then one sees folks with head phones from smartphone to ears. That probably means, the people around me are mechanical droids recharging and/or getting instructions, right? Probably Merovingian minions, to boot.in the 1960s, the CIA used chemical warfare to kill all the birds in the world and replace them with drones!!
It's TRUE. Why do you think that they always perch on electrical lines! It's to charge their batteries!!!
[In all seriousness, B, a satire along the same lines as the Flying Spaghetti Monster. IIRC the main group literally has "This is satire" on their site.]
Overturned where, though? The current rule in the EU is that remarks can be quashed regardless of truth. "The truth is no defense," as one opinion put it. The UK and Canada seem to operate off the same thinking. The American VP designee is on record saying that only verified remarks are protected as free speech. It's hard to overturn what cannot be discussed. "Whereof we dare not speak, we must pass over in silence," to paraphrase the Tractatus.The idea that millions of Jews lived in Europe for two thousand years and "not one of them ever" did something to a Christian child they shouldn't have.
It may be that this "conspiracy" is being overturned though:
The idea that millions of Jews lived in Europe for two thousand years and "not one of them ever" did something to a Christian child they shouldn't have.
It may be that this "conspiracy" is being overturned though:
Not long ago, any kind of rethink of the "blood libel" would have been astonishing, let alone one coming from a well-connected academic. That he had to rescind his remarks wasn't unnoticed by historians either.Overturned where, though? The current rule in the EU is that remarks can be quashed regardless of truth. "The truth is no defense," as one opinion put it. The UK and Canada seem to operate off the same thinking. The American VP designee is on record saying that only verified remarks are protected as free speech. It's hard to overturn what cannot be discussed. "Whereof we dare not speak, we must pass over in silence," to paraphrase the Tractatus.