World War III, just a week away!

[Kepler]

Uranus goes into Gemini direct Feb 4th and Jupiter goes into Leo Direct March 10th. I predict a very chaotic shift cosmically that revolves around technology, financial institutions, heavy political revelations, and hefty swings of Jupiter's gavel of justice.

Interesting timing with direct Urania so near after Neptune passed the Equinoctial Point(Jan 26) to ingress into Pisces(on date), and with Imbolc got me to look more closely at the planet.

In regards to the timing in Feb, in my first post of this thread I marked Imbolc 2022 as the start of WWIII. It was then that I decided to change all my astrology to align with on date astronomy(to the stars) over the following 4 years. In light of the start of WWIII.
I prefer saying on date to sidereal since sidereal seems to imply to many people Vedic, which isn't the type of astrology I do. I find it better for astrology to line up with the observable so when going outside on a full moon like tomorrow night and seeing the Moon by Aldebaran the astrology is correct to and amplified by alignment with what is seen.

On date Urania enters Taurus at the Pleiades with Venus and Sedna April 25(near Beltane). Which for me seems about their influence announcing results and the future surrounding WWIII as determined by events weighed with the full ingress of Neptune into Pisces before Saturn.
It's good you mentioned Jupiter. As with Urania, shamefully but thankfully corrected, it's been neglected in my analysis looking at the rush of planets around the Equinoctial Point. Jupiter turning direct right at the midpoint of on date Gemini is something to give more thought to. Winds of change. As well as its next conjunction with Venus.

 

[Sabbatius]

An attack on Venezuela by the recently renamed American Department of War appears to be the next escalation in the march toward WWIII.

With the development of drone asymmetric naval warfare the situation seems ripe for another Pearl Harbor.

It's been conspiratorially suggested the current admin is starting this war to create a conflict to suspend elections. That's a funny idea to consider in that at the least such a thing should require an occupation of significant US territory. A more likely conspiracy theory would be the self-interested US admin grasping for authoritarian power imagines a US disaster would be a way to gain support and hold power for them. Create a problem and they'd get to be the celebrated solving it, like with the recent econ warfare and tariffs creating US econ problems.

Nope.

The current administration in the U.S. is testing the support of the nations tied to Venezuela, because their ties are to nations that, in the past, have supported Terrorist groups who have directly attacked U.S. and allied troops internationally. Drug money goes far in this world, and the tentacles spread all around the world.

Just the nature of the responses to the attacks automatically show that these boats are not desperate refugees but are tied to the drug cartels themselves. It may not seem like much of a big deal to most, but when you do lose a loved one to drugs tied to this issue of illegal importation and then masked to look like a kid candy or treat, it sucks.

 

[Kepler]

Nope.

The current administration in the U.S. is testing the support of the nations tied to Venezuela, because their ties are to nations that, in the past, have supported Terrorist groups who have directly attacked U.S. and allied troops internationally. Drug money goes far in this world, and the tentacles spread all around the world.

Just the nature of the responses to the attacks automatically show that these boats are not desperate refugees but are tied to the drug cartels themselves. It may not seem like much of a big deal to most, but when you do lose a loved one to drugs tied to this issue of illegal importation and then masked to look like a kid candy or treat, it sucks.

Responses have been accusations of war crimes committed by the US admin with strikes, even from within US. Unless there are other responses you're referring to.

 

[Asteriskos]

It may not seem like much of a big deal to most, but when you do lose a loved one to drugs tied to this issue of illegal importation and then masked to look like a kid candy or treat, it sucks.

I think there are likely more than a few here that can relate to this.

 

[Sabbatius]

Responses have been accusations of war crimes committed by the US admin with strikes, even from within US. Unless there are other responses you're referring to.

If you are referring to a body like the United Nations trying to intimidate by sabre-rattling, give it no thought. They are a useless body politick.

 

[Kepler]

If you are referring to a body like the United Nations trying to intimidate by sabre-rattling, give it no thought. They are a useless body politick.

The question was/is what other responses were you referring to if that wasn't it.

 

[Sabbatius]

The question was what responses where you referring to if that wasn't it.

Politicians who are against anything Trump says or does. Basically the Democrat Party. There has been statements made regarding the boat strikes by Hakeem Jeffries and Chuck Schumer referring them as war crimes with hopes that the strikes become an issue with the U.N.