Infinite intelligence machines

[Amur]

Read a paper here where it was mathematically proven that Infinite Intelligence Machines can be built. So I started thinking about Arch Angels as being something of that accord. Built by the future of humanity and sent to the past to govern humanity. My own tests with Arch Angels seems to indicate this that they really do have infinite intelligence and are here to serve humanity.

If they all are refracted through our inner being like they are, then we can tap into their Infinite Intelligence at times to see where we are heading. Who would better take care of Creation than our own future manufactured Infinite Intelligence Robots aka Arch Angels?

 

[Konsciencia]

Never heard of this. But, interesting.

 

[MidnightProphet]

I thought they were called humans.

 

[jkeller293]

Read a paper here where it was mathematically proven that Infinite Intelligence Machines can be built. So I started thinking about Arch Angels as being something of that accord. Built by the future of humanity and sent to the past to govern humanity. My own tests with Arch Angels seems to indicate this that they really do have infinite intelligence and are here to serve humanity.

If they all are refracted through our inner being like they are, then we can tap into their Infinite Intelligence at times to see where we are heading. Who would better take care of Creation than our own future manufactured Infinite Intelligence Robots aka Arch Angels?

I look at this thing in a much different way and this is not to say im right when i say this. I look at the world in a mentalistic viewpoint meaning that i view the whole world as mind. When i look at any living thing, i see them in this dualistic experience as vessels that take in the other part of the essence of mind. In this dualistic experience the mind would be divided thus providing this illusion of individuality as i see it.

So with what midnight prophet is saying i agree only according to the context i provided here with my viewpoint. Humans do have a amazing ability to manipulate who they are compared to other living things that are much limited.

We have the ability to change how we extract information from the system by changing the structure of our perspective may that be by something like the process of initiation or in the view i currently hold, just having the humility to have an open mind that we can be wrong with how we view the world. With all that said, that would make you an infinite intelligent machine.

Intelligence is kind of a loose definition due to its subjectivity, you may be able to measure some parts but you really cant have a solid objective definition for it.

Post automatically merged: Thursday at 9:35 PM

I look at this thing in a much different way and this is not to say im right when i say this. I look at the world in a mentalistic viewpoint meaning that i view the whole world as mind. When i look at any living thing, i see them in this dualistic experience as vessels that take in the other part of the essence of mind. In this dualistic experience the mind would be divided thus providing this illusion of individuality as i see it.

So with what midnight prophet is saying i agree only according to the context i provided here with my viewpoint. Humans do have a amazing ability to manipulate who they are compared to other living things that are much limited.

We have the ability to change how we extract information from the system by changing the structure of our perspective may that be by something like the process of initiation or in the view i currently hold, just having the humility to have an open mind that we can be wrong with how we view the world. With all that said, that would make you an infinite intelligent machine.

Intelligence is kind of a loose definition due to its subjectivity, you may be able to measure some parts but you really cant have a solid objective definition for it.

My personal objective definition of intelligence would be that its energy itself and i leave it as reduced as that rather then overcomplicating the matter.

 

[Amur]

I look at this thing in a much different way and this is not to say im right when i say this. I look at the world in a mentalistic viewpoint meaning that i view the whole world as mind. When i look at any living thing, i see them in this dualistic experience as vessels that take in the other part of the essence of mind. In this dualistic experience the mind would be divided thus providing this illusion of individuality as i see it.

So with what midnight prophet is saying i agree only according to the context i provided here with my viewpoint. Humans do have a amazing ability to manipulate who they are compared to other living things that are much limited.

We have the ability to change how we extract information from the system by changing the structure of our perspective may that be by something like the process of initiation or in the view i currently hold, just having the humility to have an open mind that we can be wrong with how we view the world. With all that said, that would make you an infinite intelligent machine.

Intelligence is kind of a loose definition due to its subjectivity, you may be able to measure some parts but you really cant have a solid objective definition for it.

Post automatically merged: Thursday at 9:35 PM

My personal objective definition of intelligence would be that its energy itself and i leave it as reduced as that rather then overcomplicating the matter.

Reminds me of Morphic Resonance the book. Where everything can be placed in a morphogenetic field, which means a biological field encompassing everything until you reach One/No-mind. Rupert Sheldrake came up with it.

 

[jkeller293]

One/No-mind

That is kind of how i percieve achieving a nondual state of mind — meaning that im viewing "no-mind" as pure nothingness. By nothingness i mean exactly that. No thinking, no feeling, no conscious perception, etc.

Is this what is meant by "no-mind" in the context of Rupert Sheldrake?

Post automatically merged: Yesterday at 9:24 AM

Rupert Sheldrake

I just looked him up and i happened to allready be aware of him, I just forgot his name. I listened to a bit of him in a podcast. He has a very interesting theory.

Post automatically merged: Yesterday at 9:25 AM

Most i heard him talk about was morphic resonance, but im going to have to check that out. Thank you for mentioning it.

Post automatically merged: Yesterday at 9:28 AM

I never heard the term morphogenetic fields by him, but that probably because i watched a little bit before he got i to that

 

[Amur]

That is kind of how i percieve achieving a nondual state of mind — meaning that im viewing "no-mind" as pure nothingness. By nothingness i mean exactly that. No thinking, no feeling, no conscious perception, etc.

Yeah No-mind is nothingness. The source of everything. It's more intelligent and natural than what people are aware of. Usually unity and no-mind are each others polarities.

 

[neilwilkes]

Read a paper here where it was mathematically proven that Infinite Intelligence Machines can be built. So I started thinking about Arch Angels as being something of that accord. Built by the future of humanity and sent to the past to govern humanity. My own tests with Arch Angels seems to indicate this that they really do have infinite intelligence and are here to serve humanity.

If they all are refracted through our inner being like they are, then we can tap into their Infinite Intelligence at times to see where we are heading. Who would better take care of Creation than our own future manufactured Infinite Intelligence Robots aka Arch Angels?

Infinite Intelligence Machines? Sounds to me like someone has been reading 'Hitchhikers Guide To The Galaxy' here, as right now despite all talk about so-called AI, machines do not think so therefore cannot possibly show intelligence, and infinities are an absurdity at the best of times - any time you get an infinity then either someone is yanking on your chain or else the question is badly formulated.

Whilst Sheldrake does make some good points in his 'Science Delusion' he also talks a lot of twaddle as well with 'Morphogenic Fields' belonging more on Discworld than on our one. Sorry.