Then give your opinion on what you have seen. You are now just dropping some links and wait for others to respond. That's not a conversation but being a spectator. You made this account just to post this so it's obvious you have something to say about it.I want to have a conversation about this information that is emerging, which is pretty hard to do without linking to those sources. I'm trying to navigate my own feelings about interest in his work and concern. I'm curious how other people navigate these kinds of controversies, but again it's hard to explore without looking at these different sources.
Yeah, this whole thing is absolutely pathetic, and why I have nothing to do with the "scene" anymore (not that I ever really did).My opinion is that only losers try to cancel others over private beefs.
I'm with you for most of this, but I'll always marvel at the people that prefer anonymous, poor teachers for practical magic when their practical magic skills are far from apparent given their circumstances.Honestly, all of them are like that though. Samuel David is saying that Jack Grayle casts glamors, does binding spells, and deflects whistleblowers - and I really feel like this describes 99% of occult teachers and definitely the influencers!
So Jack Grayle is a garden variety control freak. Big deal, the real question should be - how do you notice when a teacher is like this, and are you willing to deal with his domination magic in order to take his classes, just because his classes are good? (Sometimes that risk is okay - I have dealt with teachers who were psychically attacking students, and I knew it, because they had valuable knowledge that I had no other way of learning.)
Literally ALL of them do this stuff though, it's not just Jack Grayle. The teachers who don't cast magic on students are the teachers who left public teaching and the public spiritual community. They have small, intimate covens built on trust, reciprocity, and shared values, they never advertise, and they'll never become famous.
@ashlesha : where is the link for PGM Praxis 1?I never really liked Jack Grayle, he always sounded so fake when speaking. His book Hekataeon got way too much praise against what is actually practical to work within it, and his courses are excessively expensive. But I do think he's really helped with the PGM-fad that is going around right now, and brought more popularity to the book so other people are interested in practicing it and sharing their own notes. That's sort of the role I see for occult influencers and course-teachers.
I read part of Samuel David's book Rod & Ring, but didn't take to it, so I don't know much about him either. I really don't like this sort of public cancelling, but if Grayle really showed up at David's door then LOL he should totally speak up about this creep!!!
Hopefully someone leaks PGM Praxis 2 & 3 courses now![]()
How is it 'paranoid' to note that if someone's money magic was so effective, they'd just use it to amass a lot of money without needing to teach people?the paranoiac "everyone who sells occultist courses is bad" rhetoric on this forum.
For a lot of people, how you make money is as important as how much you make. It's hard to make money as an occultist--it's like making money as a musician or similar. Therefore, if you do well with an occultist main or side hustle, it's impressive.How is it 'paranoid' to note that if someone's money magic was so effective, they'd just use it to amass a lot of money without needing to teach people?
Sure, that's the case for many. It's also the case that many of these people languish in obscurity for a reason. Their magic isn't that great.If someone with real power is interested in teaching, btw, they find worthy students. They aren't just accessible to anyone with a credit card. Oh hey, another occult delusion exploded.