We can sacrifice and offer anything from the physical plane, it is about the energy which it contains, it have nothing to do with the physical plane itself. Blood, meat offering/sacrifice neither about the blood/meat itself, but what it contains, that is what can makes it valuable (the life essence for example). When you offer food, the deity won't consume the food itself, but the essence (it can actually make the food to spoil faster, which can indicate that the food as offering, was accepted), which is non-physical. When you offer blood, the blood will remain, the essence however, belongs to the entity.The gods of the Old Testament needed a lot of physical food - including human children. Perhaps they had/have physical bodies
there’s multiple references where the prophets tell the people God doesn’t want or need sacrifice, in fact in Jeremiah 6, and Isaiah God says I don’t want your offerings nor accept them as the people were acting horribly...Rambam said it was more a cultural thing.The gods of the Old Testament needed a lot of physical food - including human children. Perhaps they had/have physical bodies
The OT tells us that the sons of the gods took the daughters of men as wives and their off-spring were heroes/giants.
How did non-physical gods/angels breed with humans?
Perhaps we prefer not to think about some things
How did non-physical gods/angels breed with humans?
This is exactly why I too chose not to believe in omnipotent gods. It makes no sense for someone with infinite power and ability to "want" anything. However, being powerful but still not omnipotent, opens up the possibility of the god wanting or desiring something in return.Truly nothing is free? If I were a god, I'd expect something in return for going out of my way, but that could just be the human in me. Anyway...
God wants to share his goodness, but wanting things? No, the descriptions of God hating, loving, etc are humans trying to describe God as human emotion....it’s complicated. God is beyond emotion yet he encompasses every emotion?This is exactly why I too chose not to believe in omnipotent gods. It makes no sense for someone with infinite power and ability to "want" anything. However, being powerful but still not omnipotent, opens up the possibility of the god wanting or desiring something in return.
The Sons of God is interpreted to being humans who were mighty in statureThe OT tells us that the sons of the gods took the daughters of men as wives and their off-spring were heroes/giants.
How did non-physical gods/angels breed with humans?
Perhaps we prefer not to think about some things
(And also @SkullTraill, I suppose) You’re conflating (the Christian) God with gods.God wants to share his goodness, but wanting things? No, the descriptions of God hating, loving, etc are humans trying to describe God as human emotion....it’s complicated. God is beyond emotion yet he encompasses every emotion?
Gods & spirits don't need us to exist, they need ties to the world strong enough for them to do what we ask of them. Gods & spirits are beings of purpose, the genius of an inhuman phenomena or the crystallizations of a concept or event like Survival, 1776, or the Smith Family. Except for the spirits & gods explicitly tied to humans we are not necessary for them to survive or thrive.I'd like to get everyone's stance on this so I'll expound further: do gods or any other spirit that receives worship or veneration need us to continue to worship and venerate them? Or can they survive and perhaps even thrive without us giving them energy?
Let's discuss!
I wonder if maybe the gods change names when they lose worshipers under one nameYes but we need them too. Carl Jung pretty much nailed this stuff down with his archetypal theory .
"Archetypes (Spirts/Gods/Angels) resemble the beds of rivers: dried up (Human Consciousness left in thirst) because the water (Worship/Contemplation) has deserted them , though it may return at any time. An archetype is something like an old watercourse along which the water of life flowed for a time, digging a deep channel for itself. The longer it flowed the deeper the channel, and the more likely it is that sooner or later the water will return."
I wonder if maybe the gods change names when they lose worshipers under one name
Zechariah Sitchin made a pretty good job of demonstrating that there was/is only one set of gods at a time on this planet - until the next phase of the war in the heavens replaced them with a new set.Presumably a God can have different names, can and do appear in different religions while carrying the same role.