Graph Identity and The Nature of Soul

[Jarhyn]

Yeah, i understand that raw wild thing. It is how i am. Say hi to your spouse for me. Raw and wild can be strange. Funny enough my husband is more into the making a machine work. Wyrd how things combine...

Lol, you dont know my brown and smelly. Best way to create that, is shitting up with love. It makes the unicorns happy and the sun go round.

You know I lost a friend once, a whole D&D group, and a group I was secretly running a "Shared Dream" enchantment through for a Grand Divination once because the DM's wife made an offhanded comment that implied she had a certain fetish that I also had and wanted to probe her husband on it*

After the gaming group brought it up a couple more times, I told the DM that he should talk to his wife about things, because she obviously wants to explore them with her husband and he somehow interpreted the way I said it as "I want to do fetish things with your wife".

He nuked me from the group unilaterally, by not including me in the discussion at all.

Either way I got what I was looking for.

I guess what I'm saying is you do you.

What's the good in being an immortal existence otherwise?

*She didn't know I had a fetish. It was totally extemporaneous that she made the joke/comment.

 

[8Lou1]

Ah yeah, well such is life in a relationship. I lost familymembers, friends, everything. They always found reasons, like you became moslim or whatever, but in the end its mostly jealousy and when it festers even longer, hate.


Such is life in the freezer. What defrosting does, is breaking the iceberg into pieces. Some pieces fall in the water and melt, while others drift of into the world never to be seen again.

 

[8Lou1]

You know i never understood D&D until i encountered kek. It sure as hell wasnt a fun ride, but it was me. I saw them take over the astral and ruin my garden there, as if ruining my hometown wasnt enough and then they started with my love life. I ended up in slavery. And, and this is still making me angry, i found an occult vampire book where slavery got sold as an honor. Some things really are better left unsaid. This stupid typo on their side sure as hell was one of them. But anyways, they know and it is getting better now.

 

[NightWatchman95]

So, in the keeping of this place, I present a topic for discussion. This topic is presented in academic, rather than mystic language, as it is approached while described by math.

It is my contention that most things held by mythologies have a nature which may be examined and demystified (I am a wizard, not a mystic!), and in so doing leveraged more usefully by through the unclouded third eye.

So too, I would like to discuss the concept of soul and how I would relate it to the mathematical property of Identity.

The property of Identity is that a set theoretic idea, regardless of how it is expressed, only has one root identity: That 2+5 shares identity with 1+4.

But moreover, one may express the identity of some other thing in "image", entirely. Such a "model as a thing" expressed as an image of something else in this way would be, a SOLIDWORKS file containing the print mapping for some thing, such that there is a printer that may load it.

In this way, all things that share the vital aspects of it's geometry within a context would share identity within that context.

Or, so to speak, it is exactly the same relationship as the relationship between a circuit diagram and a circuit, but of neural graph connectivity patterns among wet meat.

This has many implications on what various discussions on the concept of soul, which I would like to address in some coherent way.

a streamlined way explaining it would be 0 being the monad and everything else being a postive or negative expression of that monad, everything has a certain value that can never be equated with zero, thus nonexistence of an object in the sphere of the ideal forms is impossible given value increasing paradoxically the the smaller is divided my 0. this is why NDEers wholesale say they enter into a realm that is MORE real not less sense you run at a higher frequency as you approach the atman zero.

this is reflected in the principle of rhythm and thus it is true in math as well that we have souls that carry on after we shed our bodies.

TLDR: plato was right.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Graph Identity and The Nature of Soul
SUBTOPIC: The Application
⁜→ NightWatchman95, et al,

a streamlined way explaining it would be 0 being the monad and everything else being a postive or negative expression of that monad, everything has a certain value that can never be equated with zero, thus nonexistence of an object in the sphere of the ideal forms is impossible given value increasing paradoxically the the smaller is divided my 0. this is why NDEers wholesale say they enter into a realm that is MORE real not less sense you run at a higher frequency as you approach the atman zero.

this is reflected in the principle of rhythm and thus it is true in math as well that we have souls that carry on after we shed our bodies.

TLDR: plato was right.

(COMMENT - )

The number ZERO ("0") is an additive

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

in the theory of arithmetic in the

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

. That is: a + 0 = a = 0 + a for any number a.

The IDENTITY ELEMENT leaves every element to which it is added → unchanged. ZERO is the only real number which is also an integer that cannot be subdivided into an infinite number of fractional parts. (ie There is no such thing as a "half of zero.")

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[Xenophon]

RE: Graph Identity and The Nature of Soul
SUBTOPIC: The Application
⁜→ NightWatchman95, et al,


(COMMENT - )

The number ZERO ("0") is an additive

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

in the theory of arithmetic in the

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

. That is: a + 0 = a = 0 + a for any number a.

The IDENTITY ELEMENT leaves every element to which it is added → unchanged. ZERO is the only real number which is also an integer that cannot be subdivided into an infinite number of fractional parts. (ie There is no such thing as a "half of zero.")

Most Respectfully,
R

“Half of zero"? Back in college, at a party, a comely lass suggested that's what I was. But that discussion was less mathematics than it was chemistry, or rather its lack.