Retarded Christians Once Again Censoring Books

[Yazata]

I think if you listen to the quote from the book in the video linked above and think that is similar to the text of the Song of Songs you are not serious.

 

[Morell]

I think if you listen to the quote from the book in the video linked above and think that is similar to the text of the Song of Songs you are not serious.

Possible. Cannot tell, my browser doesn't load the video.

 

[Durward]

Comparing a book that teaches morals to a book that describes the pleasures of gay anal sex is a great point.

LMFAO to 'teaching morals'... wow. Somebody thinks fake morals and ethics taught by men claiming it comes from a misogynistic Sky Santa are somehow ok, after thousands of years of murder and mayhem done in the name of that exact horrible book. Millions of deaths. Slavery. This is the way... sure. But it somehow is better than books describing sexual encounters? The Inquisition is suddenly morals and ethics? Forcing religions on people with the threat of death is so moral and ethical. All these priests molesting children, so moral and ethical.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

[Yazata]

I thought the topic of this thread was books that were being banned (but in reality are simply being withheld from young children)
But it seems neither one of you bothered to listen to the quotes. Just be angry at those mean Christians..

 

[Beyond Everything]

Comparing a book that teaches morals

lol the book that teaches genocide and slavery? lol

Post automatically merged: Yesterday at 8:06 PM

I thought the topic of this thread was books that were being banned (but in reality are simply being withheld from young children)

Other critics say the bill would create barriers for students in schools that don’t have libraries or have limited book collections. Five of the Des Moines School District’s schools do not have libraries and about 12,000 middle and high school students use their school ID cards at Des Moines Public Libraries

 

[Durward]

I thought the topic of this thread was books that were being banned (but in reality are simply being withheld from young children)
But it seems neither one of you bothered to listen to the quotes. Just be angry at those mean Christians..

My part was about the false assumption that these same people, who are making the bans, are mostly White Christian Nationalists who thump children on the head with that horrible book, and brainwash them using this book full of hatred and division, incest, murder, genocide and more, with threats and usually fear of hell. This is the ultimate of the pot calling the kettle black. Some of these same folks are slowly being arrested for child porn, incest, rape, murder, abuse and more. There is a huge failure in what they think they stand for, and most of them are horrible and abusive parents that should be in jail.

The point is actually;
There is nothing wrong with making certain books age-appropriate only, and putting them in a section that you can't enter. And you can't even check them out unless you are old enough.
There is also nothing wrong with making parents responsible for parenting, and not forcing the rest of the public to face banned printed materials because of your own bad parenting or bad management of a library. Banning books is plain and simple NAZI FASCIST BS.

In addition, creating any law because of your own religion should make that religion banned in the USA, because we separate church and State here, for a reason. We can't let one cult or the other try to create bans and laws based on some hate and division cult idea. We are not an oppressed Nation that belongs to any Abrahamic cult, and we will fight back when people try to introduce that sick idea.
Aren't the current riots in Abrahamic cult countries enough for people to see what happens when you lead with religious zealots?
If you let them ban things now, they won't stop until they control the media and free speech. It is that, and not the whining baby, poor me, Christian issues, where they think they need special protections so they can continue to force this sick and twisted agenda of hate and division on the rest of the planet, while calling it love thy neighbor.

The idea of these books falling in the hands of children is plainly a supervision problem, which is a library or parent problem, and not something that should ever lead to banning books of any kind. Anything leading to a ban needs to be fought immediately, with extreme prejudice.
And, if we are banning books, let's start with the Bible, the Koran, and any other book that has caused so much war and death, and stop worrying about sexual items that children got from the Internet long before any library visit.

 

[Yazata]

12,000 middle and high school students use their school ID cards at Des Moines Public Libraries

And that is the same as banning books?

Post automatically merged: Yesterday at 8:29 PM

There is nothing wrong with making certain books age-appropriate only, and putting them in a section that you can't enter. And you can't even check them out unless you are old enough.

Well, we agree then.

 

[Durward]

And that is the same as banning books?

Post automatically merged: Yesterday at 8:29 PM

Well, we agree then.

Still a far cry from the current banning that has been going on. Controlling the media is still an issue, and so is banning printed materials. The approach to fixing the issue is the issue. The people in charge are a huge issue.

 

[Morell]

I thought the topic of this thread was books that were being banned (but in reality are simply being withheld from young children)
But it seems neither one of you bothered to listen to the quotes. Just be angry at those mean Christians..

...
Guess that you are right.

...hehehe, do they realize that kids have access to the internet way sooner than access to the library?