We need to Laugh

[Konsciencia]

Does 2+2=5? or does 2+2=4?

Lol!

 

[Diluculo_DelFuego]

Lol. It depends if we need to cross check the answer, so you are correct, it could be x=5 or x=4. Mirth or laughter can indeed disarm evil.

 

[KjEno186]

two plus two = 118

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

[Xenophon]

Does 2+2=5? or does 2+2=4?

Lol!

Try telling your bank it's five when you deposit; four when you withdraw. See what happens.

 

[Ziran]

Does 2+2=5? or does 2+2=4?

Lol!

Strange but true: there's a rule in gematria that it is permissible to add 1 to any answer to reinforce a pre-established relationship. It's called the Kolel-gematria.

~Ahhhh the games we play... with ourselves~

 

[Xenophon]

Strange but true: there's a rule in gematria that it is permissible to add 1 to any answer to reinforce a pre-established relationship. It's called the Kolel-gematria.

~Ahhhh the games we play... with ourselves~

So, if I REALLY want to reinforce a relationship that I'm sure is there, I can keep adding ones till I get what I want? Sounds like playing Calvinball in the old comic strip Calvin & Hobbes.

 

[Yazata]

2+2 = 22, the whole Hebrew alphabet and thus everything (if you are a kabalist)

 

[Vandheer]

Does 2+2=5? or does 2+2=4?

Lol!

Nice of the asylum to let you out for a bit

 

[Xenophon]

2+2 = 22, the whole Hebrew alphabet and thus everything (if you are a kabalist)

Is this some semite-snickermittel? A joke the goyim don't get? It must be the New Math. Crowley already taught me 1+1=0

Oh, and smile when you sneer kabalist there, stranger. I'm a Qabalist. That's tipped with a "Q-". Get my consonants straight.

 

[Ziran]

So, if I REALLY want to reinforce a relationship that I'm sure is there, I can keep adding ones till I get what I want?

Maybe. Math is fun. Can you show me an example?

Post automatically merged: Nov 14, 2023

It must be the New Math

New π >> Old π

 

[stalkinghyena]

Crowley already taught me 1+1=0

Actually, it should be 1+(-1) = 0, as opposed to his interpretation of Waite's conception of the formula of mysticism as 1-1=0.
But you are right in the sense of 2=0, although I think this more properly represents a Sephirothic stage in the evolution from the Ain Soph into the Supernals (minus Kether, it being pre-dynamic Tao) and the cosexual reflection back into it. Thus he crowned himself Ipsissimus.

Strange but true: there's a rule in gematria that it is permissible to add 1 to any answer to reinforce a pre-established relationship. It's called the Kolel-gematria.

Beautiful. I will add that to my own metathesis.

 

[Konsciencia]

Oh guys and gals, I'm cracking up here!

 

[stalkinghyena]

Oh guys and gals, I'm cracking up here!

Hi-five

 

[Konsciencia]

Hi-five

Hi-five

 

[Pyrokar]

Ew. Math. Get the pyres ready.

 

[Ziran]

Oh guys and gals, I'm cracking up here!

... and now for something completely different.

Monty Python's Flying Circus presents the enormous commerical opportunities of flying sheep... en francais.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

 

[Xenophon]

Hi-five

Shouldn't that be high-four?

 

[Yazata]

Shouldn't that be high-four?

4:20..

 

[SkullTraill]

We need to laugh in the Lounge. Not in the General Occult Discussion forum.

 

[Konsciencia]

We need to laugh in the Lounge. Not in the General Occult Discussion forum.

Oh, I'm sorry SkullTraill. I didn't know where to place it, but now I know.