Honestly I don't even think of myself as a "magician" or "occultist" right now because I don't have any tested and observed "feats". I'm still just a noob trying to get past the first benchmark to even begin trying to acquire an ability to test. If people ask I'll say that I am one, in the same way that I'll state Christianity as my religion on a form I'm signing, it's just a formality. Until I can do something that truly proves my capability to myself, and repeat that feat at least 2 more times (so I know it's not a fluke), I won't consider myself to be an occultist/magician.
The annoying thing about all this is that there is no clear and defined path, and the entire process is inundated with thousands of false/inefficient paths. If you want to learn math you can get any math textbook, and the process for addition will always be the same and give you the same result.
If you want to test and see if magic is real, and try to attain magic abilities, you'll find one person mentioning a book about some working you can do with entities that H.P. Lovecraft invented, and another guy telling you to try doing some "Christian Magic" with angels, which just sounds like a contradiction since the Bible pretty much outlaws magic, etc.
There is no standard and most people can't be trusted, so it's like an endless road of trial and error until you hopefully discover "the real thing". But the sad part is, even if you somehow discover "the real thing" one day, you'll likely be practicing and inferior and weak form of it, because you didn't get proper training.
Everybody just seems to be "winging it" and cobbling together their own system of magick from whatever they've researched, and then these cobbled together systems become the basis of future cobbled together systems, and we all just get further and further away from the "true source".
There really should be some kind of universal textbook for magic.
I already know that people are going to say - "There isn't only one path, there are many paths"
But the absolute truth is that there is always a path that is the most optimal. There is a path that yields the most benefit with the least amount of effort and risk required. Just like there exists and algorithm for a specific coding task that is simply superior to all other other algorithms.
There is always a "superior option", and it annoys me that the elders of the occult community as a whole have yet to come together to unanimously find and declare that methodology.
Of course, that's just the public occult community. I would not be surprised if there was some secret society of occultists with a tested and standardized training for initiation into the occult and how to practice magic. People like me will just never be lucky enough to encounter something like that.
One of the main pains of existence is realizing that a lot of life comes down to random chance, pure luck. I can only speak to you like this because I was lucky enough to be born without any mental defects that crippled my intellect. The reason why I can walk is because I was lucky enough to not be born with any physical defects that crippled by mobility. This can be extrapolated to everything else in life, people just don't like to think about it because it makes them feel powerless.
We all get to choose, but life chooses the options that we are allowed to choose from, so our choice is merely an illusion. I'm sure there's some lucky f**k out there born into a family of occult practitioners that was raised and trained from young to learn the things that I have yet to discover (or may never discover).
There are some very healthy perspectives in this post, as there were in another post you made considering how the standards of magic have dropped in order to accommodate run-of-the-mill mental experiences.
I would argue that the roots of this are in Jung's psychoanalytical reinterpretation of alchemy. I do not dismiss Jung's exceptional insights but he set the precedent for a non-paranormal interpretation of the occult. Many would-be magicians do set out for a paranormal experience, find that they don't get one and then (perhaps to not lose face to themselves) retreat into magic as a language for explaining their inner life. As with Jung, sometimes that can produce insights and "poetic imagination" can be a nice way to experience life. However, it more often becomes a mental apparatus which comes between the "magician" and life, leading to confusion, delusion and obscurum per obscurius ("Yes Becky, absinthe may 'belong in Netzach' but how does that help you and why can't you be normal around people?"). It is, in other words, an elaborate and time-consuming mental game.
In the
Golden Bough, James Frazer famously wrote that magic is "a false science”. In historical terms, this is largely correct. The occult deserves the critique because, throughout history, occultists have been utterly addicted to
external explanations for those occasions when magic does work. It's the influence of the "planetary spheres", "astral" shenanigans or the interventions of angels, demons, etc. The scientific method and reason, a far better faculty for investigating the external, objective world, has made it much harder to sustain these explanations, even among occultists. Yet, turbo-charged by its success in material areas, for some, reason has become the barometer for explaining everything rather than just one limited mental faculty among many (it's necessarily limited because it's "for" dealing with matter/quantity rather than quality). Hardcore rationalists are often found in the strange and, ironically, emotionally driven position of trusting only matter and dismissing every single magical and mystical experience that has ever been reported on the planet. Because they have dismissed the frameworks which previously "explained" those experiences does not mean that the experience itself has been dismissed.
Magic is real but most of what has been written about it is nonsense. Most, but not all. Crowley made the breakthrough that magic isn't bestowed by exterior powers but it is consciousness extending itself outside of the body in hitherto unexplained ways. There is your "true source": consciousness. I entirely share Crowley's view. As with all things, there are variables, elements which mean that sometimes magic will produce a stronger effect than at other times. Many of those variables are still being explored, many of the laws which govern magic are still being discovered. One known law is that, like a muscle, consciousness has to be trained in this work and with increased training it can perform magic with increasing accuracy and power, provided it is doing so in a circumstances where there aren't stronger forces at play.
There really should be some kind of universal textbook for magic.
Write it! But first train and join with others who are exploring. Given many of the dispositions displayed by your posts you'll be far better off in the New Aeon set (Thelemic, Setian, Chaote) than Old Aeon systems.